Reconnecting with Nature in the Age of Technology : The Heidegger and Radical Environmentalism Debate Revisited

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The relation between Martin Heidegger and radical environmentalism has been subject of discussion for several years now. On the one hand, Heidegger is portrayed as a forerunner of the deep ecology movement, providing an alternative for the technological age we live in. On the other, commentators contend that the basic thrust of Heidegger’s thought cannot be found in such an ecological ethos. In this article, this debate is revisited in order to answer the question whether it is possible to conceive human dwelling on earth in a way which is consistent with the technological world we live in and heralds another beginning at the same time. Our point of departure in this article is not the work of Heidegger but the affordance theory of James Gibson, which will prove to be highly compatible with the radical environmentalist concept of nature as well as Heidegger’s concept of the challenging of nature.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-332
JournalEnvironmental Philosophy
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Nature
Environmentalism
Martin Heidegger
Ethos
Deep Ecology
Affordances
Dwelling
Concepts of Nature
Forerunner
Commentators

Cite this

@article{abc5e883f02c4c34ba589ad020734fb3,
title = "Reconnecting with Nature in the Age of Technology : The Heidegger and Radical Environmentalism Debate Revisited",
abstract = "The relation between Martin Heidegger and radical environmentalism has been subject of discussion for several years now. On the one hand, Heidegger is portrayed as a forerunner of the deep ecology movement, providing an alternative for the technological age we live in. On the other, commentators contend that the basic thrust of Heidegger’s thought cannot be found in such an ecological ethos. In this article, this debate is revisited in order to answer the question whether it is possible to conceive human dwelling on earth in a way which is consistent with the technological world we live in and heralds another beginning at the same time. Our point of departure in this article is not the work of Heidegger but the affordance theory of James Gibson, which will prove to be highly compatible with the radical environmentalist concept of nature as well as Heidegger’s concept of the challenging of nature.",
author = "V. Blok",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.5840/envirophil20149913",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "307--332",
journal = "Environmental Philosophy",
issn = "1718-0198",
publisher = "Philosophy Documentation Center",
number = "2",

}

Reconnecting with Nature in the Age of Technology : The Heidegger and Radical Environmentalism Debate Revisited. / Blok, V.

In: Environmental Philosophy, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2014, p. 307-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconnecting with Nature in the Age of Technology : The Heidegger and Radical Environmentalism Debate Revisited

AU - Blok, V.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The relation between Martin Heidegger and radical environmentalism has been subject of discussion for several years now. On the one hand, Heidegger is portrayed as a forerunner of the deep ecology movement, providing an alternative for the technological age we live in. On the other, commentators contend that the basic thrust of Heidegger’s thought cannot be found in such an ecological ethos. In this article, this debate is revisited in order to answer the question whether it is possible to conceive human dwelling on earth in a way which is consistent with the technological world we live in and heralds another beginning at the same time. Our point of departure in this article is not the work of Heidegger but the affordance theory of James Gibson, which will prove to be highly compatible with the radical environmentalist concept of nature as well as Heidegger’s concept of the challenging of nature.

AB - The relation between Martin Heidegger and radical environmentalism has been subject of discussion for several years now. On the one hand, Heidegger is portrayed as a forerunner of the deep ecology movement, providing an alternative for the technological age we live in. On the other, commentators contend that the basic thrust of Heidegger’s thought cannot be found in such an ecological ethos. In this article, this debate is revisited in order to answer the question whether it is possible to conceive human dwelling on earth in a way which is consistent with the technological world we live in and heralds another beginning at the same time. Our point of departure in this article is not the work of Heidegger but the affordance theory of James Gibson, which will prove to be highly compatible with the radical environmentalist concept of nature as well as Heidegger’s concept of the challenging of nature.

U2 - 10.5840/envirophil20149913

DO - 10.5840/envirophil20149913

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 307

EP - 332

JO - Environmental Philosophy

JF - Environmental Philosophy

SN - 1718-0198

IS - 2

ER -