Abstract
The UN Food Systems Summit was an ambitious and hotly contested event that brought competing approaches to global food governance into relief. In this article, we unpack the rival visions that circulate around how food systems should be governed, focusing on two issues that we feel are at the heart of these divergences: authority and legitimacy. We illustrate how both corporate-philanthropic and food sovereignty networks are struggling to establish epistemic authority of food systems as well as produce legitimacy through very different approaches to participation and accountability.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 181-191 |
| Journal | Development (Basingstoke) |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| Early online date | 13 Oct 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
Keywords
- Multi-stakeholderism
- Multilateralism
- UN Committee on World Food Security
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reconfiguring Food Systems Governance: The UNFSS and the Battle Over Authority and Legitimacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver