TY - JOUR
T1 - Recognizing local people's priorities for tropical forest biodiversity
AU - Sheil, Douglas
AU - Puri, Rajindra
AU - Wan, Meilinda
AU - Basuki, Imam
AU - Van Heist, Miriam
AU - Liswanti, Nining
AU - Rukmiyati, null
AU - Rachmatika, Ike
AU - Samsoedin, Ismayadi
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2006/2
Y1 - 2006/2
N2 - Tropical forest people often suffer from the same processes that threaten biodiversity. An improved knowledge of what is important to local people could improve decision making. This article examines the usefulness of explicitly asking what is important to local people. Our examples draw on biodiversity surveys in East Kalimantan (Indonesian Borneo). With local communities we characterized locally valued habitats, species, and sites, and their significance. This process clarified various priorities and threats, suggested refinements and limits to management options, and indicated issues requiring specific actions, further investigation, or both. It also shows how biological evaluations are more efficient with local guidance, and reveals potential for collaborations between local communities and those concerned with conservation. Such evaluations are a first step in facilitating the incorporation of local concerns into higher-level decision making. Conservationists who engage with local views can benefit from an expanded constituency, and from new opportunities for pursuing effective conservation.
AB - Tropical forest people often suffer from the same processes that threaten biodiversity. An improved knowledge of what is important to local people could improve decision making. This article examines the usefulness of explicitly asking what is important to local people. Our examples draw on biodiversity surveys in East Kalimantan (Indonesian Borneo). With local communities we characterized locally valued habitats, species, and sites, and their significance. This process clarified various priorities and threats, suggested refinements and limits to management options, and indicated issues requiring specific actions, further investigation, or both. It also shows how biological evaluations are more efficient with local guidance, and reveals potential for collaborations between local communities and those concerned with conservation. Such evaluations are a first step in facilitating the incorporation of local concerns into higher-level decision making. Conservationists who engage with local views can benefit from an expanded constituency, and from new opportunities for pursuing effective conservation.
U2 - 10.1579/0044-7447-35.1.17
DO - 10.1579/0044-7447-35.1.17
M3 - Article
C2 - 16615694
AN - SCOPUS:33645239680
SN - 0044-7447
VL - 35
SP - 17
EP - 24
JO - Ambio
JF - Ambio
IS - 1
ER -