Reassessing science communication for effective farmland biodiversity conservation

Elena Velado-Alonso*, David Kleijn, Ignasi Bartomeus

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Integrating biodiversity conservation into agriculture is a pressing challenge promoted by conservationists. Although biodiversity can also provide important benefits to farmers, the adoption of biodiversity-enhancing measures is lagging behind the scientific evidence. This may partially be related to the way scientists position themselves. If scientists do not convincingly communicate about the implications of their evidence, other interested stakeholders will drive the conversations. To increase societal impact, scientists must understand the complex communication environment and take an informed and strategic position. We describe the prevailing conservation and farming narratives, highlighting how the term ‘biodiversity’ can be used to start dialogues between parties with conflicting demands and exemplifying how scientists can build effective narratives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)537-547
JournalTrends in Ecology and Evolution
Volume39
Issue number6
Early online date22 Feb 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • agriculture
  • biodiversity
  • communication
  • conservation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reassessing science communication for effective farmland biodiversity conservation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this