Re-introducing politics in African farmer-led irrigation development: Introduction to a special issue

Gert Jan Veldwisch, Jean Philippe Venot, Philip Woodhouse, Hans C. Komakech, Dan Brockington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This introduction is a reflexive piece on the notion of farmer-led irrigation development and its politics. It highlights the way the varied contributions to the Special Issue support a shared perspective on farmer-led irrigation development as a process whereby farmers drive the establishment, improvement, and/or expansion of irrigated agriculture, often in interaction with other actors. We analyse how the terminology is used and reproduced, and what it means for our understanding of irrigation policy and practices in sub-Saharan Africa. A central tenet of our argument is that farmer-led irrigation development is inherently political, as it questions the primacy of engineering and other expert knowledges regarding the development of agricultural water use practices in Africa as well as the privileging of formal state planning or technical solutions. We show how mainstream understanding of farmers' engagement focuses on (1) regulation and control, (2) profitability, and (3) technical efficiency. We demonstrate how these three perspectives have contributed to depoliticised readings of farmer-led irrigation (development), which has been essential to the ability of the terminology to travel and find global allies. Second, we explore the paradox of the invisibility of farmer-led irrigation development in national policies and practices. We discuss practical and political reasons underlying this silence and point out that there are important advantages for irrigators in not being visible. In conclusion we highlight what can be gained from adopting an explicitly political analysis of the processes through which farmers engage in irrigation on their own terms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalWater Alternatives
Volume12
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

irrigation
politics
farmer
terminology
technical language
technical efficiency
state planning
expert knowledge
profitability
water use
allies
agriculture
travel
engineering
regulation
water
efficiency
ability
interaction

Keywords

  • Expert knowledges
  • Farmer-led irrigation development
  • Irrigation
  • Irrigation policies
  • State planning
  • Sub-Saharan Africa

Cite this

Veldwisch, G. J., Venot, J. P., Woodhouse, P., Komakech, H. C., & Brockington, D. (2019). Re-introducing politics in African farmer-led irrigation development: Introduction to a special issue. Water Alternatives, 12(1), 1-12.
Veldwisch, Gert Jan ; Venot, Jean Philippe ; Woodhouse, Philip ; Komakech, Hans C. ; Brockington, Dan. / Re-introducing politics in African farmer-led irrigation development : Introduction to a special issue. In: Water Alternatives. 2019 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 1-12.
@article{62a4046dab5d4a588a9c57a91f2039ba,
title = "Re-introducing politics in African farmer-led irrigation development: Introduction to a special issue",
abstract = "This introduction is a reflexive piece on the notion of farmer-led irrigation development and its politics. It highlights the way the varied contributions to the Special Issue support a shared perspective on farmer-led irrigation development as a process whereby farmers drive the establishment, improvement, and/or expansion of irrigated agriculture, often in interaction with other actors. We analyse how the terminology is used and reproduced, and what it means for our understanding of irrigation policy and practices in sub-Saharan Africa. A central tenet of our argument is that farmer-led irrigation development is inherently political, as it questions the primacy of engineering and other expert knowledges regarding the development of agricultural water use practices in Africa as well as the privileging of formal state planning or technical solutions. We show how mainstream understanding of farmers' engagement focuses on (1) regulation and control, (2) profitability, and (3) technical efficiency. We demonstrate how these three perspectives have contributed to depoliticised readings of farmer-led irrigation (development), which has been essential to the ability of the terminology to travel and find global allies. Second, we explore the paradox of the invisibility of farmer-led irrigation development in national policies and practices. We discuss practical and political reasons underlying this silence and point out that there are important advantages for irrigators in not being visible. In conclusion we highlight what can be gained from adopting an explicitly political analysis of the processes through which farmers engage in irrigation on their own terms.",
keywords = "Expert knowledges, Farmer-led irrigation development, Irrigation, Irrigation policies, State planning, Sub-Saharan Africa",
author = "Veldwisch, {Gert Jan} and Venot, {Jean Philippe} and Philip Woodhouse and Komakech, {Hans C.} and Dan Brockington",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Water Alternatives",
issn = "1965-0175",
publisher = "Water Alternatives Association",
number = "1",

}

Veldwisch, GJ, Venot, JP, Woodhouse, P, Komakech, HC & Brockington, D 2019, 'Re-introducing politics in African farmer-led irrigation development: Introduction to a special issue' Water Alternatives, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-12.

Re-introducing politics in African farmer-led irrigation development : Introduction to a special issue. / Veldwisch, Gert Jan; Venot, Jean Philippe; Woodhouse, Philip; Komakech, Hans C.; Brockington, Dan.

In: Water Alternatives, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re-introducing politics in African farmer-led irrigation development

T2 - Introduction to a special issue

AU - Veldwisch, Gert Jan

AU - Venot, Jean Philippe

AU - Woodhouse, Philip

AU - Komakech, Hans C.

AU - Brockington, Dan

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - This introduction is a reflexive piece on the notion of farmer-led irrigation development and its politics. It highlights the way the varied contributions to the Special Issue support a shared perspective on farmer-led irrigation development as a process whereby farmers drive the establishment, improvement, and/or expansion of irrigated agriculture, often in interaction with other actors. We analyse how the terminology is used and reproduced, and what it means for our understanding of irrigation policy and practices in sub-Saharan Africa. A central tenet of our argument is that farmer-led irrigation development is inherently political, as it questions the primacy of engineering and other expert knowledges regarding the development of agricultural water use practices in Africa as well as the privileging of formal state planning or technical solutions. We show how mainstream understanding of farmers' engagement focuses on (1) regulation and control, (2) profitability, and (3) technical efficiency. We demonstrate how these three perspectives have contributed to depoliticised readings of farmer-led irrigation (development), which has been essential to the ability of the terminology to travel and find global allies. Second, we explore the paradox of the invisibility of farmer-led irrigation development in national policies and practices. We discuss practical and political reasons underlying this silence and point out that there are important advantages for irrigators in not being visible. In conclusion we highlight what can be gained from adopting an explicitly political analysis of the processes through which farmers engage in irrigation on their own terms.

AB - This introduction is a reflexive piece on the notion of farmer-led irrigation development and its politics. It highlights the way the varied contributions to the Special Issue support a shared perspective on farmer-led irrigation development as a process whereby farmers drive the establishment, improvement, and/or expansion of irrigated agriculture, often in interaction with other actors. We analyse how the terminology is used and reproduced, and what it means for our understanding of irrigation policy and practices in sub-Saharan Africa. A central tenet of our argument is that farmer-led irrigation development is inherently political, as it questions the primacy of engineering and other expert knowledges regarding the development of agricultural water use practices in Africa as well as the privileging of formal state planning or technical solutions. We show how mainstream understanding of farmers' engagement focuses on (1) regulation and control, (2) profitability, and (3) technical efficiency. We demonstrate how these three perspectives have contributed to depoliticised readings of farmer-led irrigation (development), which has been essential to the ability of the terminology to travel and find global allies. Second, we explore the paradox of the invisibility of farmer-led irrigation development in national policies and practices. We discuss practical and political reasons underlying this silence and point out that there are important advantages for irrigators in not being visible. In conclusion we highlight what can be gained from adopting an explicitly political analysis of the processes through which farmers engage in irrigation on their own terms.

KW - Expert knowledges

KW - Farmer-led irrigation development

KW - Irrigation

KW - Irrigation policies

KW - State planning

KW - Sub-Saharan Africa

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Water Alternatives

JF - Water Alternatives

SN - 1965-0175

IS - 1

ER -