Re-evaluating luminescence burial doses and bleaching of fluvial deposits using Bayesian computational statistics.

A.C. Cunningham, J. Wallinga, Alice Versendaal, A. Makaske, H. Middelkoop, N. Hobo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) signal from fluvial sediment often contains a remnant from the previous deposition cycle, leading to a partially bleached equivalent-dose distribution. Although identification of the burial dose is of primary concern, the degree of bleaching could potentially provide insights into sediment transport processes. However, comparison of bleaching between samples is complicated by sample-to-sample variation in aliquot size and luminescence sensitivity. Here we begin development of an age model to account for these effects. With measurement data from multi-grain aliquots, we use Bayesian computational statistics to estimate the burial dose and bleaching parameters of the single-grain dose distribution. We apply the model to 46 samples taken from fluvial sediment of Rhine branches in the Netherlands, and compare the results with environmental predictor variables (depositional environment, texture, sample depth, depth relative to mean water level, dose rate). Although obvious correlations with predictor variables are absent, there is some suggestion that the best-bleached samples are found close to the modern mean water level, and that the extent of bleaching has changed over the recent past. We hypothesise that sediment deposited near the transition of channel to overbank deposits receives the most sunlight exposure, due to local reworking after deposition. However, nearly all samples are inferred to have at least some well-bleached grains, suggesting that bleaching also occurs during fluvial transport.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-65
JournalEarth Surface Dynamics
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Re-evaluating luminescence burial doses and bleaching of fluvial deposits using Bayesian computational statistics.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this