Re-conceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development. Towards a negotiation approach

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    192 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In many popular intervention methodologies aimed at stimulating sustainable rural development (in the widest possible sense) the idea of 'participation' is a leading principle. This article will demonstrate that the process in which actors are supposed to participate is often thought of as being a process of planning, decision-making and/or social learning. It will be argued that such an operationalization of development processes is based on inconsistent theoretical assumptions, and can easily lead to unproductive development interventions due to an inability to handle conflicts. As an alternative it is proposed to use negotiation theory as a basis for organizing participatory development efforts. The implications of such a shift in thinking about participation are far-reaching: it requires new modes of analysis, and different roles, tasks and skills for facilitators of participatory processes.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)931-959
    JournalDevelopment and Change
    Volume31
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2000

    Fingerprint

    rural development
    sustainable development
    participation
    learning
    decision making
    methodology
    operationalization
    social learning
    planning
    analysis
    conflict

    Cite this

    @article{801f5223147b46a6b3e8e582d725ab8e,
    title = "Re-conceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development. Towards a negotiation approach",
    abstract = "In many popular intervention methodologies aimed at stimulating sustainable rural development (in the widest possible sense) the idea of 'participation' is a leading principle. This article will demonstrate that the process in which actors are supposed to participate is often thought of as being a process of planning, decision-making and/or social learning. It will be argued that such an operationalization of development processes is based on inconsistent theoretical assumptions, and can easily lead to unproductive development interventions due to an inability to handle conflicts. As an alternative it is proposed to use negotiation theory as a basis for organizing participatory development efforts. The implications of such a shift in thinking about participation are far-reaching: it requires new modes of analysis, and different roles, tasks and skills for facilitators of participatory processes.",
    author = "C. Leeuwis",
    year = "2000",
    doi = "10.1111/1467-7660.00184",
    language = "English",
    volume = "31",
    pages = "931--959",
    journal = "Development and Change",
    issn = "0012-155X",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "5",

    }

    Re-conceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development. Towards a negotiation approach. / Leeuwis, C.

    In: Development and Change, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2000, p. 931-959.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Re-conceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development. Towards a negotiation approach

    AU - Leeuwis, C.

    PY - 2000

    Y1 - 2000

    N2 - In many popular intervention methodologies aimed at stimulating sustainable rural development (in the widest possible sense) the idea of 'participation' is a leading principle. This article will demonstrate that the process in which actors are supposed to participate is often thought of as being a process of planning, decision-making and/or social learning. It will be argued that such an operationalization of development processes is based on inconsistent theoretical assumptions, and can easily lead to unproductive development interventions due to an inability to handle conflicts. As an alternative it is proposed to use negotiation theory as a basis for organizing participatory development efforts. The implications of such a shift in thinking about participation are far-reaching: it requires new modes of analysis, and different roles, tasks and skills for facilitators of participatory processes.

    AB - In many popular intervention methodologies aimed at stimulating sustainable rural development (in the widest possible sense) the idea of 'participation' is a leading principle. This article will demonstrate that the process in which actors are supposed to participate is often thought of as being a process of planning, decision-making and/or social learning. It will be argued that such an operationalization of development processes is based on inconsistent theoretical assumptions, and can easily lead to unproductive development interventions due to an inability to handle conflicts. As an alternative it is proposed to use negotiation theory as a basis for organizing participatory development efforts. The implications of such a shift in thinking about participation are far-reaching: it requires new modes of analysis, and different roles, tasks and skills for facilitators of participatory processes.

    U2 - 10.1111/1467-7660.00184

    DO - 10.1111/1467-7660.00184

    M3 - Article

    VL - 31

    SP - 931

    EP - 959

    JO - Development and Change

    JF - Development and Change

    SN - 0012-155X

    IS - 5

    ER -