Rapid diversity loss of competing animal sppecies in well-connected landscapes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Population viability of a single species, when evaluated with metapopulation based landscape evaluation tools, always increases when the connectivity of the landscape increases. However, when interactions between species are taken into account, results can differ. We explore this issue using a stochastic spatially explicit meta-community model with 21 competing species in five different competitive settings: (1) weak, coexisting competition, (2) neutral competition, (3) strong, excluding competition, (4) hierarchical competition and (5) random species competition. The species compete in randomly generated landscapes with various fragmentation levels. With this model we study species loss over time. Simulation results show that overall diversity, the species richness in the entire landscape, decreases slowly in fragmented landscapes whereas in well-connected landscapes rapid species losses occur. These results are robust with respect to changing competitive settings, species parameters and spatial configurations. They indicate that optimal landscape configuration for species conservation differs between metapopulation approaches, modelling species separately and meta-community approaches allowing species interactions. The mechanism behind this is that species in well-connected landscapes rapidly outcompete each other. Species that become abundant, by chance or by their completive strength, send out large amounts of dispersers that colonize and take over other patches that are occupied by species that are less abundant. This mechanism causes rapid species loss. In fragmented landscapes the colonization rate is lower, and it is difficult for a new species to establish in an already occupied patch. So, here dominant species cannot easily take over patches occupied by other species and higher diversity is maintained for a longer time. These results suggest that fragmented landscapes have benefits for species conservation previously unrecognized by the landscape ecology and policy community. When species interactions are important, landscapes with a low fragmentation level can be better for species conservation than well-connected landscapes. Moreover, our results indicate that metapopulation based landscape evaluation tools may overestimate the value of connectivity and should be replaced by more realistic meta-community based tools.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0132383
Number of pages17
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume10
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • woodpecker dendrocopos-medius
  • squirrel sciurus-carolinensis
  • great spotted woodpeckers
  • neutral-theory
  • habitat fragmentation
  • riverine forest
  • climate-change
  • coexistence
  • abundance
  • metapopulations

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Rapid diversity loss of competing animal sppecies in well-connected landscapes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this