@inbook{05c1fa8f59204798ad40769f637e53b8,
title = "Procedural Theory in EU Law",
abstract = "In this contribution I put forward the argument that (1) the application of the adjudicative principle of {\textquoteleft}procedural autonomy{\textquoteright} leads to the creation of a European judge-made procedural law. Further, this procedural law exhibits (2) a potentially problematic trans-substantive tendency, as well as (3) a conceptual difficulty as it is applied regardless of a procedural/substance distinction, exemplified, for example, in its treatment of damages. There is therefore the need for a mechanism of differentiation in the application of the principle of {\textquoteleft}procedural autonomy{\textquoteright}, which at the same time articulates procedural justice concerns.",
author = "H. Schebesta",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-04903-8_42",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319049021",
series = "Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation",
publisher = "Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht Londond",
number = "3",
pages = "851--862",
editor = "K. Purnhagen and P. Rott",
booktitle = "Varieties of European Economic Law and Regulation",
}