Predicting population and community dynamics: the type of aggregation matters

K. Meyer, T. Schiffers, T. Münkemüller, M. Schädler, J. Calabrese, A. Basset, M. Breulmann, S. Duquesne, B. Hidding, A. Huth, C. Schöb, T.F.J. van de Voorde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When investigating complex ecological dynamics at the population or community level, we necessarily need to abstract and aggregate ecological information. The way in which information is aggregated may be crucial for the outcome of the study. In this paper, we suggest that in addition to the traditional spatial, temporal and organizational levels, we need a more flexible framework linking ecological processes, study objects and types of aggregation. We develop such a framework and exemplify the most commonly used types of aggregation and their potential influence on identifiable drivers of community dynamics. We also illustrate strategies to narrow down the range of possible aggregation types for a particular study. With this approach, we hope (i) to clarify the function of aggregation types as related to traditional ecological levels and (ii) to raise the awareness of how important a deliberate way of aggregating ecological information is for a sound and reliable outcome of any empirical or theoretical ecological study
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)563-571
JournalBasic and Applied Ecology
Volume11
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • plant genotype
  • body-size
  • environmental-change
  • soil-microorganisms
  • ecological networks
  • trait convergence
  • trophic guilds
  • bewicks swans
  • burial depth
  • food webs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting population and community dynamics: the type of aggregation matters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this