Postregistration monitoring of pesticides is urgently required to protect ecosystems

Martina G. Vijver*, Ellard R. Hunting, Tom A.P. Nederstigt, Wil L.M. Tamis, Paul J. van den Brink, Peter M. van Bodegom

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current admission policies for pesticides follow a controlled experimental tiered risk assessment approach, giving results that are difficult to extrapolate to a real-world situation. Later analyses of compounds such as DDT and neonicotinoid pesticides clearly show that the actual chemical impacts frequently affect many more components of an ecosystem than a priori suggested by risk assessment. Therefore, to manage the actual risks for ecosystems imposed by manufactured compounds, it is proposed that current admission policies for chemicals be enriched by using postregistration monitoring. Such monitoring is essential to identify unexpected direct and indirect impacts on organisms by accounting for multiple propagation routes and exposures. Implementation of postregistration monitoring could build on existing monitoring networks. This approach would tackle the current policy impasse of compartment-based regulations versus exposure-based regulations, and, more importantly, would provide a safety lock for risk assessment across compartments and more likely ensure the protection of our natural environment. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:860–865.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)860-865
JournalEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Ecology
  • Environmental risk assessment
  • Monitoring
  • Pesticides
  • Water

Cite this

Vijver, M. G., Hunting, E. R., Nederstigt, T. A. P., Tamis, W. L. M., van den Brink, P. J., & van Bodegom, P. M. (2017). Postregistration monitoring of pesticides is urgently required to protect ecosystems. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 36(4), 860-865. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3721