Positive interactions between legume intensification technologies and agronomic management: Evidence from participatory on-farm experiments

Mukoma Kilakila, Renske Hijbeek, Katrien Descheemaeker, Ken E. Giller, Jens A. Andersson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Context
Smallholder farming in Tanzania centres predominantly on maize as the staple crop, integrated with grain legumes. Technologies like mineral fertilisers and rhizobial inoculants can enhance legume yields and overall farm production, yet their adoption remains limited.
Objectives
This study explores the performance of these technologies across diverse field conditions and assesses their relevance for smallholders.
Methods
In the 2022/2023 seasons, 40 on-farm experiments were conducted on diverse farmers’ fields in the Songwe region, Tanzania. We assessed the effects of phosphorus (P) fertilisers and Rhizobium inoculation on soybean (Glycine max) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) yields with improved varieties, and farmer perceptions of these technologies.
Results
Grain yields in unamended control plots varied widely: from 0.2 t ha−1 to 2.3 t ha−1 for soybean and from 0.1 t ha−1 to 1.2 t ha−1 for common bean, influenced by soil properties such as soil pH, soil P, and agronomic practices such as timing of weeding. On average, Rhizobium inoculation increased soybean yields by 46 % but did not affect common bean yields; On average phosphorus application increased soybean and common bean by 52 % and 50 %, respectively. Combining P and inoculation raised mean soybean yields by 66 % and common bean by 75 %. Mean return on investment exceeds 2 for all technologies, with soybean inoculation favoured by farmers for its cost-effectiveness. Delayed weeding caused a 75 % reduction in soybean yield in controls. However, delayed weeding with P fertilisers and/or Rhizobium inoculation had no significant negative yield effect, indicating a positive interaction between these technologies and management practices.
Conclusions
Our findings show the potential of legume intensification technologies, yet with availability, cost, and market challenges.
Original languageEnglish
Article number109926
JournalField Crops Research
Volume328
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Positive interactions between legume intensification technologies and agronomic management: Evidence from participatory on-farm experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this