Policymakers, Consider Reducing Reliability

Brian Davidson*, Petra Hellegers, Biju George, Hector Malano

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this study, the physical and economic impacts of four policy measures (crop diversification, improved watershed development, canal lining and reducing the level of reliability) all designed to improve bulk water supply, are assessed in a case study of the Musi catchment of India. The aim is to compare the impacts these policy measures have on the amount of bulk water supplied and the net economic returns across a complex multi-nodal catchment. It is argued that because it is policymakers who make decisions regarding these measures, an assessment of the private benefits to a subset of users would not be adequate. Rather, the society wide costs and benefits need to be considered. Using a hydroeconomic model of the catchment it was found that reducing the level of reliability was the most beneficial outcome from both a physical and economic perspective. The other three measures were found to have some adverse impacts on regions not directly affected by the measure.

Original languageEnglish
Article number799139
JournalFrontiers in Water
Volume4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Apr 2022

Keywords

  • demand management
  • hydroeconomic assessment
  • India
  • network improvement
  • policymakers
  • reliability
  • watershed development (WSD)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Policymakers, Consider Reducing Reliability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this