Policy innovation by and for non-state initiatives in green open space

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The aim of this work is to compare initiatives by Dutch citizens and ‘social enterprises’ for nature to those of the state and to identify how the state can support such initiatives. We base our analytical framework on the Policy Arrangement Approach (PAA) and formulate recommendations for policy support and innovation by authorities. The study shows that compared to the state, the citizens and social enterprises almost naturally integrate between sectors. They contribute and share own resources, adopt not-for-profit principles and share benefits. They attribute a broader variety of values to nature and enrich the meaning and use of green open space, responding to their own wishes and those of (part of) the local community. We recommend a formal policy discourse that includes non-state local initiatives, to diminish internal barriers within the authority offices and not to support initiatives that can only be sustained at high costs or don’t have the support of the neighbourhood. The PAA shows useful for explaining the differences in outcomes between non-state developed green open space and that by the state, and to formulate recommendations.
LanguageEnglish
Pages121-150
JournalSpanish Journal of Rural Development
Volume6
Issue number3-4
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

innovation policy
profit principle
citizen
innovation
discourse
costs
resources
community
Values

Cite this

@article{526de3afd0e248f78f96c463dbaabc47,
title = "Policy innovation by and for non-state initiatives in green open space",
abstract = "The aim of this work is to compare initiatives by Dutch citizens and ‘social enterprises’ for nature to those of the state and to identify how the state can support such initiatives. We base our analytical framework on the Policy Arrangement Approach (PAA) and formulate recommendations for policy support and innovation by authorities. The study shows that compared to the state, the citizens and social enterprises almost naturally integrate between sectors. They contribute and share own resources, adopt not-for-profit principles and share benefits. They attribute a broader variety of values to nature and enrich the meaning and use of green open space, responding to their own wishes and those of (part of) the local community. We recommend a formal policy discourse that includes non-state local initiatives, to diminish internal barriers within the authority offices and not to support initiatives that can only be sustained at high costs or don’t have the support of the neighbourhood. The PAA shows useful for explaining the differences in outcomes between non-state developed green open space and that by the state, and to formulate recommendations.",
author = "C. Aalbers and J. Luttik and {De Haas}, W. and H. Pijls",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "121--150",
journal = "Spanish Journal of Rural Development",
issn = "2171-1216",
number = "3-4",

}

Policy innovation by and for non-state initiatives in green open space. / Aalbers, C.; Luttik, J.; De Haas, W.; Pijls, H.

In: Spanish Journal of Rural Development, Vol. 6, No. 3-4, 2015, p. 121-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policy innovation by and for non-state initiatives in green open space

AU - Aalbers, C.

AU - Luttik, J.

AU - De Haas, W.

AU - Pijls, H.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The aim of this work is to compare initiatives by Dutch citizens and ‘social enterprises’ for nature to those of the state and to identify how the state can support such initiatives. We base our analytical framework on the Policy Arrangement Approach (PAA) and formulate recommendations for policy support and innovation by authorities. The study shows that compared to the state, the citizens and social enterprises almost naturally integrate between sectors. They contribute and share own resources, adopt not-for-profit principles and share benefits. They attribute a broader variety of values to nature and enrich the meaning and use of green open space, responding to their own wishes and those of (part of) the local community. We recommend a formal policy discourse that includes non-state local initiatives, to diminish internal barriers within the authority offices and not to support initiatives that can only be sustained at high costs or don’t have the support of the neighbourhood. The PAA shows useful for explaining the differences in outcomes between non-state developed green open space and that by the state, and to formulate recommendations.

AB - The aim of this work is to compare initiatives by Dutch citizens and ‘social enterprises’ for nature to those of the state and to identify how the state can support such initiatives. We base our analytical framework on the Policy Arrangement Approach (PAA) and formulate recommendations for policy support and innovation by authorities. The study shows that compared to the state, the citizens and social enterprises almost naturally integrate between sectors. They contribute and share own resources, adopt not-for-profit principles and share benefits. They attribute a broader variety of values to nature and enrich the meaning and use of green open space, responding to their own wishes and those of (part of) the local community. We recommend a formal policy discourse that includes non-state local initiatives, to diminish internal barriers within the authority offices and not to support initiatives that can only be sustained at high costs or don’t have the support of the neighbourhood. The PAA shows useful for explaining the differences in outcomes between non-state developed green open space and that by the state, and to formulate recommendations.

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 121

EP - 150

JO - Spanish Journal of Rural Development

T2 - Spanish Journal of Rural Development

JF - Spanish Journal of Rural Development

SN - 2171-1216

IS - 3-4

ER -