Abstract
Matching rural policy and practice has become increasingly difficult. Despite a shift from government to governance, a void is often perceived to exist between policy and practice. This article discusses two hypotheses on the emergence of such a void. The first argues that the void is a result of a process of value differentiation. The second explains the void as a result of a process of depoliticisation. This article examines whether these hypotheses hold true for Dutch rural policy. The analysis shows that though both hypotheses are true for a limited extent, neither succeeds in explaining the changes in Dutch (rural) policy on its own. Instead, it is argued that both are needed for a comprehensive analysis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 299-317 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Sociologia Ruralis |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
Keywords
- civil-society
- q-methodology
- power
- politics
- participation
- discourses
- democracy
- state
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Policies in de Polder How Institutions Mediate between Norms and Practices of Rural Governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver