Plastic responses to novel environments are biased towards phenotype dimensions with high additive genetic variation

Daniel W.A. Noble*, Reinder Radersma, Tobias Uller

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Environmentally induced phenotypes have been proposed to initiate and bias adaptive evolutionary change toward particular directions. The potential for this to happen depends in part on how well plastic responses are aligned with the additive genetic variance and covariance in traits. Using meta-analysis, we demonstrate that plastic responses to novel environments tend to occur along phenotype dimensions that harbor substantial amounts of additive genetic variation. This suggests that selection for or against environmentally induced phenotypes typically will be effective. One interpretation of the alignment between the direction of plasticity and the main axis of additive genetic variation is that developmental systems tend to respond to environmental novelty as they do to genetic mutation. This makes it challenging to distinguish if the direction of evolution is biased by plasticity or genetic “constraint.” Our results therefore highlight a need for new theoretical and empirical approaches to address the role of plasticity in evolution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13452-13461
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume116
Issue number27
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jul 2019

Keywords

  • Cryptic genetic
  • Evolvability
  • Phenotypic accommodation
  • Phenotypic plasticity
  • Variation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Plastic responses to novel environments are biased towards phenotype dimensions with high additive genetic variation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this