Perspectives on agriculturally used drained peat soils: Comparison of the socioeconomic and ecological business environments of six European regions

Christoph Buschmann*, Norbert Röder, Kerstin Berglund, Örjan Berglund, Poul Erik Lærke, Martin Maddison, Ülo Mander, Merja Myllys, Bernhard Osterburg, Jan J.H. van den Akker

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In Northern, Eastern and Central European countries, peat soils drained for agriculture are a considerable source of greenhouse gas emissions. Since emissions from this source have high mitigation potential, they will likely be a focus of the European Union's future climate goals. We describe and compare the similarities and differences in the socioeconomic and ecological business environment that policy makers, planners and farmers are confronted with when developing tailored proposals for low emission land use alternatives on peat land. The analysis is based on interviews with 33 typical farmers cultivating organic soils and on expert group discussions held in six different Northern, Eastern and Central European regions. Based on the Social-Ecological System Framework we identify and cluster important variables. Our results show that mainly hard economic variables determine preferred land use alternatives: the productivity of resource systems, the economic value of land and market incentives. Other variables, such as the heterogeneity of users and conflicts among them, are more important with respect to the implementation of alternatives. We point out possibilities to transfer solutions between regions and discuss an institutional framework for European Union, national and regional levels for facilitating implementation potential.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104181
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume90
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

Fingerprint

peat soils
peat soil
Eastern European region
Northern European region
Central European region
European Union
socioeconomics
land use
farmers
farmer
greenhouse gas emissions
economic valuation
organic soils
peat
interviews
institutional framework
ecological system
economic value
agriculture
markets

Keywords

  • Climate mitigation
  • Peatland management
  • Social-ecological system framework

Cite this

Buschmann, Christoph ; Röder, Norbert ; Berglund, Kerstin ; Berglund, Örjan ; Lærke, Poul Erik ; Maddison, Martin ; Mander, Ülo ; Myllys, Merja ; Osterburg, Bernhard ; van den Akker, Jan J.H. / Perspectives on agriculturally used drained peat soils: Comparison of the socioeconomic and ecological business environments of six European regions. In: Land Use Policy. 2020 ; Vol. 90.
@article{38eeba830a0145b6b89e8068664ce8a0,
title = "Perspectives on agriculturally used drained peat soils: Comparison of the socioeconomic and ecological business environments of six European regions",
abstract = "In Northern, Eastern and Central European countries, peat soils drained for agriculture are a considerable source of greenhouse gas emissions. Since emissions from this source have high mitigation potential, they will likely be a focus of the European Union's future climate goals. We describe and compare the similarities and differences in the socioeconomic and ecological business environment that policy makers, planners and farmers are confronted with when developing tailored proposals for low emission land use alternatives on peat land. The analysis is based on interviews with 33 typical farmers cultivating organic soils and on expert group discussions held in six different Northern, Eastern and Central European regions. Based on the Social-Ecological System Framework we identify and cluster important variables. Our results show that mainly hard economic variables determine preferred land use alternatives: the productivity of resource systems, the economic value of land and market incentives. Other variables, such as the heterogeneity of users and conflicts among them, are more important with respect to the implementation of alternatives. We point out possibilities to transfer solutions between regions and discuss an institutional framework for European Union, national and regional levels for facilitating implementation potential.",
keywords = "Climate mitigation, Peatland management, Social-ecological system framework",
author = "Christoph Buschmann and Norbert R{\"o}der and Kerstin Berglund and {\"O}rjan Berglund and L{\ae}rke, {Poul Erik} and Martin Maddison and {\"U}lo Mander and Merja Myllys and Bernhard Osterburg and {van den Akker}, {Jan J.H.}",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104181",
language = "English",
volume = "90",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Perspectives on agriculturally used drained peat soils: Comparison of the socioeconomic and ecological business environments of six European regions. / Buschmann, Christoph; Röder, Norbert; Berglund, Kerstin; Berglund, Örjan; Lærke, Poul Erik; Maddison, Martin; Mander, Ülo; Myllys, Merja; Osterburg, Bernhard; van den Akker, Jan J.H.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 90, 104181, 01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perspectives on agriculturally used drained peat soils: Comparison of the socioeconomic and ecological business environments of six European regions

AU - Buschmann, Christoph

AU - Röder, Norbert

AU - Berglund, Kerstin

AU - Berglund, Örjan

AU - Lærke, Poul Erik

AU - Maddison, Martin

AU - Mander, Ülo

AU - Myllys, Merja

AU - Osterburg, Bernhard

AU - van den Akker, Jan J.H.

PY - 2020/1

Y1 - 2020/1

N2 - In Northern, Eastern and Central European countries, peat soils drained for agriculture are a considerable source of greenhouse gas emissions. Since emissions from this source have high mitigation potential, they will likely be a focus of the European Union's future climate goals. We describe and compare the similarities and differences in the socioeconomic and ecological business environment that policy makers, planners and farmers are confronted with when developing tailored proposals for low emission land use alternatives on peat land. The analysis is based on interviews with 33 typical farmers cultivating organic soils and on expert group discussions held in six different Northern, Eastern and Central European regions. Based on the Social-Ecological System Framework we identify and cluster important variables. Our results show that mainly hard economic variables determine preferred land use alternatives: the productivity of resource systems, the economic value of land and market incentives. Other variables, such as the heterogeneity of users and conflicts among them, are more important with respect to the implementation of alternatives. We point out possibilities to transfer solutions between regions and discuss an institutional framework for European Union, national and regional levels for facilitating implementation potential.

AB - In Northern, Eastern and Central European countries, peat soils drained for agriculture are a considerable source of greenhouse gas emissions. Since emissions from this source have high mitigation potential, they will likely be a focus of the European Union's future climate goals. We describe and compare the similarities and differences in the socioeconomic and ecological business environment that policy makers, planners and farmers are confronted with when developing tailored proposals for low emission land use alternatives on peat land. The analysis is based on interviews with 33 typical farmers cultivating organic soils and on expert group discussions held in six different Northern, Eastern and Central European regions. Based on the Social-Ecological System Framework we identify and cluster important variables. Our results show that mainly hard economic variables determine preferred land use alternatives: the productivity of resource systems, the economic value of land and market incentives. Other variables, such as the heterogeneity of users and conflicts among them, are more important with respect to the implementation of alternatives. We point out possibilities to transfer solutions between regions and discuss an institutional framework for European Union, national and regional levels for facilitating implementation potential.

KW - Climate mitigation

KW - Peatland management

KW - Social-ecological system framework

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104181

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104181

M3 - Article

VL - 90

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

M1 - 104181

ER -