Permafrost Region Greenhouse Gas Budgets Suggest a Weak CO2 Sink and CH4 and N2O Sources, But Magnitudes Differ Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Methods

G. Hugelius*, J. Ramage, E. Burke, A. Chatterjee, T.L. Smallman, T. Aalto, A. Bastos, C. Biasi, J.G. Canadell, N. Chandra, F. Chevallier, P. Ciais, J. Chang, L. Feng, M.W. Jones, T. Kleinen, M. Kuhn, R. Lauerwald, J. Liu, E. López-BlancoI.T. Luijkx, M.E. Marushchak, S.M. Natali, Y. Niwa, D. Olefeldt, P.I. Palmer, P.K. Patra, W. Peters, S. Potter, B. Poulter, B.M. Rogers, W.J. Riley, M. Saunois, E.A.G. Schuur, R.L. Thompson, C. Treat, A. Tsuruta, M.R. Turetsky, A.M. Virkkala, C. Voigt, J. Watts, Q. Zhu, B. Zheng

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Permafrost Region Greenhouse Gas Budgets Suggest a Weak CO2 Sink and CH4 and N2O Sources, But Magnitudes Differ Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Earth and Planetary Sciences