Permafrost Region Greenhouse Gas Budgets Suggest a Weak CO2 Sink and CH4 and N2O Sources, But Magnitudes Differ Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Methods

G. Hugelius*, J. Ramage, E. Burke, A. Chatterjee, T.L. Smallman, T. Aalto, A. Bastos, C. Biasi, J.G. Canadell, N. Chandra, F. Chevallier, P. Ciais, J. Chang, L. Feng, M.W. Jones, T. Kleinen, M. Kuhn, R. Lauerwald, J. Liu, E. López-BlancoI.T. Luijkx, M.E. Marushchak, S.M. Natali, Y. Niwa, D. Olefeldt, P.I. Palmer, P.K. Patra, W. Peters, S. Potter, B. Poulter, B.M. Rogers, W.J. Riley, M. Saunois, E.A.G. Schuur, R.L. Thompson, C. Treat, A. Tsuruta, M.R. Turetsky, A.M. Virkkala, C. Voigt, J. Watts, Q. Zhu, B. Zheng

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Large stocks of soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) in northern permafrost soils are vulnerable to remobilization under climate change. However, there are large uncertainties in present-day greenhouse gas (GHG) budgets. We compare bottom-up (data-driven upscaling and process-based models) and top-down (atmospheric inversion models) budgets of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) as well as lateral fluxes of C and N across the region over 2000–2020. Bottom-up approaches estimate higher land-to-atmosphere fluxes for all GHGs. Both bottom-up and top-down approaches show a sink of CO2 in natural ecosystems (bottom-up: −29 (−709, 455), top-down: −587 (−862, −312) Tg CO2-C yr−1) and sources of CH4 (bottom-up: 38 (22, 53), top-down: 15 (11, 18) Tg CH4-C yr−1) and N2O (bottom-up: 0.7 (0.1, 1.3), top-down: 0.09 (−0.19, 0.37) Tg N2O-N yr−1). The combined global warming potential of all three gases (GWP-100) cannot be distinguished from neutral. Over shorter timescales (GWP-20), the region is a net GHG source because CH4 dominates the total forcing. The net CO2 sink in Boreal forests and wetlands is largely offset by fires and inland water CO2 emissions as well as CH4 emissions from wetlands and inland waters, with a smaller contribution from N2O emissions. Priorities for future research include the representation of inland waters in process-based models and the compilation of process-model ensembles for CH4 and N2O. Discrepancies between bottom-up and top-down methods call for analyses of how prior flux ensembles impact inversion budgets, more and well-distributed in situ GHG measurements and improved resolution in upscaling techniques.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2023GB007969
Number of pages28
JournalGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles
Volume38
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Oct 2024

Keywords

  • carbon budget
  • carbon dioxide
  • methane
  • nitrous oxide
  • permafrost region
  • RECCAP2

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Permafrost Region Greenhouse Gas Budgets Suggest a Weak CO2 Sink and CH4 and N2O Sources, But Magnitudes Differ Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this