Performing accountability: face-to-face account-giving in multilateral climate transparency processes

A. Gupta*, S.I.S.E. Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S.I.M. Kamil, A.Q. Ching, N. Bernaz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Securing accountability of states for their climate actions is a continuing challenge within multilateral climate politics. This article analyses how novel, face-to-face, account-giving processes for developing countries, referred to as ‘Facilitative Sharing of Views’, are functioning within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and what these processes help to shed light on. We analyse the nature and scope of the ‘answerability’ being generated within these novel processes, including what state-to-state questioning and responses focus on, and what ‘performing’ accountability in this manner delivers within multilateral climate politics. We find that a limited number of countries actively question each other within the FSV process, with a primary focus on sharing information about the technical and institutional challenges of establishing domestic ‘measuring, reporting and verification’ systems and, to lesser extent, mitigation actions. Less attention is given to reporting on support. A key aim is to facilitate learning, both from the process and from each other. Much effort is expended on legitimizing the FSV process in anticipation of its continuation in adapted form under the 2015 Paris Agreement. We conclude by considering implications of our analysis.
Original languageEnglish
JournalClimate Policy
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Jan 2021

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Performing accountability: face-to-face account-giving in multilateral climate transparency processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this