Optimizing sampling strategies for sib test schemes in a broiler breeder program

C.A. de Hollander, V.P. Breen, J. Henshall, F.B. Lopes, M.P.L. Calus

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference paperAcademic

Abstract

In broiler breeding there is a known genotype by environment interaction for bodyweight measured in a bio-secure (BWB) or in a commercial environment (BWC), thus a sib test scheme to record and use BWC records is beneficial. This study estimated a genetic correlation of 0.59 between BWB and BWC. To optimize the sib scheme, different genotype proportions (25, 50, 75%) and sampling strategies were studied. No pedigree information was available for birds in the commercial environment unless they were genotyped. Genotyping based on phenotypes, heaviest and lightest, resulted in the highest accuracy compared to random genotyping 0.88 vs 0.80 at 25%, 0.94 vs 0.89 for 50 and 0.97 vs 0.95 at 75% genotyped. No bias was observed with random sampling, however bias was detected with sampling based on phenotypes (0.58 at 25%, 0.76 at 50 and 0.91 at 75%).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of 12th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP)
Subtitle of host publicationTechnical and species orientated innovations in animal breeding, and contribution of genetics to solving societal challenges
EditorsR.F. Veerkamp, Y. de Haas
Place of PublicationWageningen
PublisherWageningen Academic Publishers
Pages1812-1815
ISBN (Electronic)9789086869404
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022
EventWorld Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production: WCGALP 2022 - Rotterdam, Netherlands
Duration: 3 Jul 20228 Jul 2022

Conference/symposium

Conference/symposiumWorld Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production: WCGALP 2022
Country/TerritoryNetherlands
CityRotterdam
Period3/07/228/07/22

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimizing sampling strategies for sib test schemes in a broiler breeder program'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this