Opportunities and pitfalls for researchers to contribute to the design of evidence-based agricultural policies: lessons from Uganda

P.N. Pali, M. Schut, P. Kibwika, L. Wairegi, M. Yami, P.J.A. van Asten, V.M. Manyong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Agricultural policies in sub-Saharan Africa have paid insufficient attention to sustainable intensification. In Uganda, agricultural productivity has stagnated with aggregate increases in crop production being attributed to expansion of cultivated land area. To enhance sustainable crop intensification, the Ugandan Government collaborated with stakeholders to develop agricultural policies using an evidence-based approach. Previously, evidence-based decision-making tended to focus on the evidence base rather than evidence and its interactions within the broader policy context. We identify opportunities and pitfalls to strengthen science engagement in agricultural policy design by analysing the types of evidence required, and how it was shared and used during policy development. Qualitative tools captured stakeholders' perspectives of agricultural policies and their status in the policy cycle. Subsequent multi-level studies identified crop growth constraints and quantified yield gaps which were used to compute the economic analyses of policy options that subsequently contributed to sub-national program planning. The study identified a need to generate relevant evidence within a short time 'window' to influence policy design, power influence by different stakeholders and quality of stakeholder interaction. Opportunities for evidence integration surfaced at random phases of policy development due to researchers’ ’embededness’ within co-management and coordination structures.

LanguageEnglish
Pages272-285
JournalInternational Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
Volume16
Issue number3
Early online date15 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

agricultural policy
Uganda
stakeholders
researchers
development policy
national planning
collaborative management
program planning
Sub-Saharan Africa
crops
crop production
decision making
economics
Evidence-based
Agricultural policy
Stakeholders
Crops
Policy design
Interaction
Policy development

Keywords

  • agricultural service provision
  • policy development process
  • stakeholder engagement
  • Sub-Saharan Africa

Cite this

Pali, P.N. ; Schut, M. ; Kibwika, P. ; Wairegi, L. ; Yami, M. ; van Asten, P.J.A. ; Manyong, V.M. / Opportunities and pitfalls for researchers to contribute to the design of evidence-based agricultural policies : lessons from Uganda. In: International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 2018 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 272-285.
@article{1469d9ae3a9e4c4ab696268d64586c95,
title = "Opportunities and pitfalls for researchers to contribute to the design of evidence-based agricultural policies: lessons from Uganda",
abstract = "Agricultural policies in sub-Saharan Africa have paid insufficient attention to sustainable intensification. In Uganda, agricultural productivity has stagnated with aggregate increases in crop production being attributed to expansion of cultivated land area. To enhance sustainable crop intensification, the Ugandan Government collaborated with stakeholders to develop agricultural policies using an evidence-based approach. Previously, evidence-based decision-making tended to focus on the evidence base rather than evidence and its interactions within the broader policy context. We identify opportunities and pitfalls to strengthen science engagement in agricultural policy design by analysing the types of evidence required, and how it was shared and used during policy development. Qualitative tools captured stakeholders' perspectives of agricultural policies and their status in the policy cycle. Subsequent multi-level studies identified crop growth constraints and quantified yield gaps which were used to compute the economic analyses of policy options that subsequently contributed to sub-national program planning. The study identified a need to generate relevant evidence within a short time 'window' to influence policy design, power influence by different stakeholders and quality of stakeholder interaction. Opportunities for evidence integration surfaced at random phases of policy development due to researchers’ ’embededness’ within co-management and coordination structures.",
keywords = "agricultural service provision, policy development process, stakeholder engagement, Sub-Saharan Africa",
author = "P.N. Pali and M. Schut and P. Kibwika and L. Wairegi and M. Yami and {van Asten}, P.J.A. and V.M. Manyong",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/14735903.2018.1471830",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "272--285",
journal = "International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability",
issn = "1473-5903",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

Opportunities and pitfalls for researchers to contribute to the design of evidence-based agricultural policies : lessons from Uganda. / Pali, P.N.; Schut, M.; Kibwika, P.; Wairegi, L.; Yami, M.; van Asten, P.J.A.; Manyong, V.M.

In: International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2018, p. 272-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opportunities and pitfalls for researchers to contribute to the design of evidence-based agricultural policies

T2 - International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability

AU - Pali, P.N.

AU - Schut, M.

AU - Kibwika, P.

AU - Wairegi, L.

AU - Yami, M.

AU - van Asten, P.J.A.

AU - Manyong, V.M.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Agricultural policies in sub-Saharan Africa have paid insufficient attention to sustainable intensification. In Uganda, agricultural productivity has stagnated with aggregate increases in crop production being attributed to expansion of cultivated land area. To enhance sustainable crop intensification, the Ugandan Government collaborated with stakeholders to develop agricultural policies using an evidence-based approach. Previously, evidence-based decision-making tended to focus on the evidence base rather than evidence and its interactions within the broader policy context. We identify opportunities and pitfalls to strengthen science engagement in agricultural policy design by analysing the types of evidence required, and how it was shared and used during policy development. Qualitative tools captured stakeholders' perspectives of agricultural policies and their status in the policy cycle. Subsequent multi-level studies identified crop growth constraints and quantified yield gaps which were used to compute the economic analyses of policy options that subsequently contributed to sub-national program planning. The study identified a need to generate relevant evidence within a short time 'window' to influence policy design, power influence by different stakeholders and quality of stakeholder interaction. Opportunities for evidence integration surfaced at random phases of policy development due to researchers’ ’embededness’ within co-management and coordination structures.

AB - Agricultural policies in sub-Saharan Africa have paid insufficient attention to sustainable intensification. In Uganda, agricultural productivity has stagnated with aggregate increases in crop production being attributed to expansion of cultivated land area. To enhance sustainable crop intensification, the Ugandan Government collaborated with stakeholders to develop agricultural policies using an evidence-based approach. Previously, evidence-based decision-making tended to focus on the evidence base rather than evidence and its interactions within the broader policy context. We identify opportunities and pitfalls to strengthen science engagement in agricultural policy design by analysing the types of evidence required, and how it was shared and used during policy development. Qualitative tools captured stakeholders' perspectives of agricultural policies and their status in the policy cycle. Subsequent multi-level studies identified crop growth constraints and quantified yield gaps which were used to compute the economic analyses of policy options that subsequently contributed to sub-national program planning. The study identified a need to generate relevant evidence within a short time 'window' to influence policy design, power influence by different stakeholders and quality of stakeholder interaction. Opportunities for evidence integration surfaced at random phases of policy development due to researchers’ ’embededness’ within co-management and coordination structures.

KW - agricultural service provision

KW - policy development process

KW - stakeholder engagement

KW - Sub-Saharan Africa

U2 - 10.1080/14735903.2018.1471830

DO - 10.1080/14735903.2018.1471830

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 272

EP - 285

JO - International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability

JF - International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability

SN - 1473-5903

IS - 3

ER -