Opponents and supporters of water policy change in the Netherlands and Hungary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper looks at the role of individuals and the strategies that they use to bring about or oppose major policy change. Current analysis of the role that individuals or small collectives play in periods of major policy change has focussed on strategies that reinforce change and on the supporters of change. This paper adds the perspective of opponents, and asks whether they use similar strategies as those identified for supporters. Five strategies are explored: developing new ideas, building coalitions to sell ideas, using windows of opportunity, playing multiple venues and orchestrating networks. Using empirical evidence from Dutch and Hungarian water policy change, we discuss whether individuals pursued these strategies to support or oppose major policy change. Our analysis showed the significance of recognition of a new policy concept at an abstract level by responsible government actors, as well as their engagement with a credible regional coalition that can contextualise and advocate the concept regionally. The strategies of supporters were also used by opponents of water policy change. Opposition was inherent to policy change, and whether or not government actors sought to engage with opponents influenced the realisation of water policy change.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-47
JournalWater Alternatives
Volume3
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Hungary
Netherlands
water
coalition
policy
opposition
evidence

Keywords

  • water policy
  • change
  • individuals
  • interactions
  • communication
  • hungary
  • netherlands
  • influences

Cite this

@article{cb314416f1cb4248a7e7216648f64ff0,
title = "Opponents and supporters of water policy change in the Netherlands and Hungary",
abstract = "This paper looks at the role of individuals and the strategies that they use to bring about or oppose major policy change. Current analysis of the role that individuals or small collectives play in periods of major policy change has focussed on strategies that reinforce change and on the supporters of change. This paper adds the perspective of opponents, and asks whether they use similar strategies as those identified for supporters. Five strategies are explored: developing new ideas, building coalitions to sell ideas, using windows of opportunity, playing multiple venues and orchestrating networks. Using empirical evidence from Dutch and Hungarian water policy change, we discuss whether individuals pursued these strategies to support or oppose major policy change. Our analysis showed the significance of recognition of a new policy concept at an abstract level by responsible government actors, as well as their engagement with a credible regional coalition that can contextualise and advocate the concept regionally. The strategies of supporters were also used by opponents of water policy change. Opposition was inherent to policy change, and whether or not government actors sought to engage with opponents influenced the realisation of water policy change.",
keywords = "waterbeleid, verandering, individuen, interacties, communicatie, hongarije, nederland, invloeden, water policy, change, individuals, interactions, communication, hungary, netherlands, influences",
author = "S.E. Werners and J.F. Warner and D. Roth",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "26--47",
journal = "Water Alternatives",
issn = "1965-0175",
publisher = "Water Alternatives Association",
number = "1",

}

Opponents and supporters of water policy change in the Netherlands and Hungary. / Werners, S.E.; Warner, J.F.; Roth, D.

In: Water Alternatives, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2010, p. 26-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opponents and supporters of water policy change in the Netherlands and Hungary

AU - Werners, S.E.

AU - Warner, J.F.

AU - Roth, D.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This paper looks at the role of individuals and the strategies that they use to bring about or oppose major policy change. Current analysis of the role that individuals or small collectives play in periods of major policy change has focussed on strategies that reinforce change and on the supporters of change. This paper adds the perspective of opponents, and asks whether they use similar strategies as those identified for supporters. Five strategies are explored: developing new ideas, building coalitions to sell ideas, using windows of opportunity, playing multiple venues and orchestrating networks. Using empirical evidence from Dutch and Hungarian water policy change, we discuss whether individuals pursued these strategies to support or oppose major policy change. Our analysis showed the significance of recognition of a new policy concept at an abstract level by responsible government actors, as well as their engagement with a credible regional coalition that can contextualise and advocate the concept regionally. The strategies of supporters were also used by opponents of water policy change. Opposition was inherent to policy change, and whether or not government actors sought to engage with opponents influenced the realisation of water policy change.

AB - This paper looks at the role of individuals and the strategies that they use to bring about or oppose major policy change. Current analysis of the role that individuals or small collectives play in periods of major policy change has focussed on strategies that reinforce change and on the supporters of change. This paper adds the perspective of opponents, and asks whether they use similar strategies as those identified for supporters. Five strategies are explored: developing new ideas, building coalitions to sell ideas, using windows of opportunity, playing multiple venues and orchestrating networks. Using empirical evidence from Dutch and Hungarian water policy change, we discuss whether individuals pursued these strategies to support or oppose major policy change. Our analysis showed the significance of recognition of a new policy concept at an abstract level by responsible government actors, as well as their engagement with a credible regional coalition that can contextualise and advocate the concept regionally. The strategies of supporters were also used by opponents of water policy change. Opposition was inherent to policy change, and whether or not government actors sought to engage with opponents influenced the realisation of water policy change.

KW - waterbeleid

KW - verandering

KW - individuen

KW - interacties

KW - communicatie

KW - hongarije

KW - nederland

KW - invloeden

KW - water policy

KW - change

KW - individuals

KW - interactions

KW - communication

KW - hungary

KW - netherlands

KW - influences

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 26

EP - 47

JO - Water Alternatives

JF - Water Alternatives

SN - 1965-0175

IS - 1

ER -