Open Science in regulatory environmental risk assessment

Theo C.M. Brock*, Kevin C. Elliott, Anja Gladbach, Caroline Moermond, Jörg Romeis, T.B. Seiler, Keith Solomon, G.P. Dohmen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A possible way to alleviate the public skepticism toward regulatory science is to increase transparency by making all data and value judgments used in regulatory decision making accessible for public interpretation, ideally early on in the process, and following the concepts of Open Science. This paper discusses the opportunities and challenges in strengthening Open Science initiatives in regulatory environmental risk assessment (ERA). In this discussion paper, we argue that the benefits associated with Open Science in regulatory ERA far outweigh its perceived risks. All stakeholders involved in regulatory ERA (e.g., governmental regulatory authorities, private sector, academia, and nongovernmental organizations), as well as professional organizations like the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, can play a key role in supporting the Open Science initiative, by promoting the use of recommended reporting criteria for reliability and relevance of data and tools used in ERA, and by developing a communication strategy for both professionals and nonprofessionals to transparently explain the socioeconomic value judgments and scientific principles underlying regulatory ERA.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1229-1242
JournalIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Volume17
Issue number6
Early online date29 Apr 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Building trust
  • Data quality
  • Problem formulation
  • Prospective environmental risk assessment
  • Transparency

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Open Science in regulatory environmental risk assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this