Ontology of Units of Measure and Related Concepts

H. Rijgersberg, M. van Assem, J.L. Top

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    65 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper describes the Ontology of Units of Measure and Related Concepts (OM), an OWL ontology of the domain of quantities and units of measure. OM enables to make quantitative research data more explicit, so that data can be integrated, verified, repoduced, etcetera. The various options for modelling the domain are discussed. For example, physical quantities can be modeled either as classes, instances or properties. The design choices made are based on use cases from our own projects and general experience in the field. The use cases have been implemented as tools and web services. OM is compared to QUDT, another active effort for an OWL model in this domain. We note possibilities for integration of these efforts. We also discuss the role OWL plays in our approach.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3-13
    JournalSemantic Web
    Volume4
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Ontology
    Web services

    Cite this

    @article{acc9bdc5444542568f7f03a4e0ecb35b,
    title = "Ontology of Units of Measure and Related Concepts",
    abstract = "This paper describes the Ontology of Units of Measure and Related Concepts (OM), an OWL ontology of the domain of quantities and units of measure. OM enables to make quantitative research data more explicit, so that data can be integrated, verified, repoduced, etcetera. The various options for modelling the domain are discussed. For example, physical quantities can be modeled either as classes, instances or properties. The design choices made are based on use cases from our own projects and general experience in the field. The use cases have been implemented as tools and web services. OM is compared to QUDT, another active effort for an OWL model in this domain. We note possibilities for integration of these efforts. We also discuss the role OWL plays in our approach.",
    author = "H. Rijgersberg and {van Assem}, M. and J.L. Top",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.3233/SW-2012-0069",
    language = "English",
    volume = "4",
    pages = "3--13",
    journal = "Semantic Web",
    issn = "1570-0844",
    publisher = "IOS Press",
    number = "1",

    }

    Ontology of Units of Measure and Related Concepts. / Rijgersberg, H.; van Assem, M.; Top, J.L.

    In: Semantic Web, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2013, p. 3-13.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Ontology of Units of Measure and Related Concepts

    AU - Rijgersberg, H.

    AU - van Assem, M.

    AU - Top, J.L.

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - This paper describes the Ontology of Units of Measure and Related Concepts (OM), an OWL ontology of the domain of quantities and units of measure. OM enables to make quantitative research data more explicit, so that data can be integrated, verified, repoduced, etcetera. The various options for modelling the domain are discussed. For example, physical quantities can be modeled either as classes, instances or properties. The design choices made are based on use cases from our own projects and general experience in the field. The use cases have been implemented as tools and web services. OM is compared to QUDT, another active effort for an OWL model in this domain. We note possibilities for integration of these efforts. We also discuss the role OWL plays in our approach.

    AB - This paper describes the Ontology of Units of Measure and Related Concepts (OM), an OWL ontology of the domain of quantities and units of measure. OM enables to make quantitative research data more explicit, so that data can be integrated, verified, repoduced, etcetera. The various options for modelling the domain are discussed. For example, physical quantities can be modeled either as classes, instances or properties. The design choices made are based on use cases from our own projects and general experience in the field. The use cases have been implemented as tools and web services. OM is compared to QUDT, another active effort for an OWL model in this domain. We note possibilities for integration of these efforts. We also discuss the role OWL plays in our approach.

    U2 - 10.3233/SW-2012-0069

    DO - 10.3233/SW-2012-0069

    M3 - Article

    VL - 4

    SP - 3

    EP - 13

    JO - Semantic Web

    JF - Semantic Web

    SN - 1570-0844

    IS - 1

    ER -