On solving the Best-Worst Method in multi-criteria decision-making

D.J.C. Beemsterboer, E.M.T. Hendrix, G.D.H. Claassen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Decision-making often refers to ranking alternatives based on many involved criteria. Since the introduction of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in 1980, pairwise comparisons of criteria have a long tradition in multi-criteria decision-making. One of the main concerns of the AHP refers to the inconsistency of decision makers in pairwise comparisons. Recently, the Best-Worst Method (BWM) was introduced to reduce the inconsistency by a concept that needs substantially less pairwise comparisons. The BWM includes solving a non-linear model (NLM) to derive the weights from the comparisons. A linear model (LM) was introduced in a follow-up to approximate the original NLM. This paper shows that the optimal weights of the proposed linear model (LM) may differ substantially from the optimal weights of the original NLM model. Moreover, this paper provides an MILP model approximation (MILM) which can be solved by standard optimization software and illustrates that its solution approximates the optimal weights of the original NLM model arbitrarily close. Since consistency in pairwise comparisons is usually not self-evident in practice, using approximation MILM to derive unique solutions of the original NLM, extends the applicability of the Best-Worst Method.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1660-1665
JournalIFAC-PapersOnLine
Volume51
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Decision making
Analytic hierarchy process

Keywords

  • Best-worst method
  • Consistency
  • Convex optimisation
  • Linear Programming
  • Linearization
  • Mixed-integer linear programming
  • Model approximation
  • Multiple-criterion optimisation

Cite this

@article{d2ccdb249fd142afb0633da5bc8d30d7,
title = "On solving the Best-Worst Method in multi-criteria decision-making⁎",
abstract = "Decision-making often refers to ranking alternatives based on many involved criteria. Since the introduction of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in 1980, pairwise comparisons of criteria have a long tradition in multi-criteria decision-making. One of the main concerns of the AHP refers to the inconsistency of decision makers in pairwise comparisons. Recently, the Best-Worst Method (BWM) was introduced to reduce the inconsistency by a concept that needs substantially less pairwise comparisons. The BWM includes solving a non-linear model (NLM) to derive the weights from the comparisons. A linear model (LM) was introduced in a follow-up to approximate the original NLM. This paper shows that the optimal weights of the proposed linear model (LM) may differ substantially from the optimal weights of the original NLM model. Moreover, this paper provides an MILP model approximation (MILM) which can be solved by standard optimization software and illustrates that its solution approximates the optimal weights of the original NLM model arbitrarily close. Since consistency in pairwise comparisons is usually not self-evident in practice, using approximation MILM to derive unique solutions of the original NLM, extends the applicability of the Best-Worst Method.",
keywords = "Best-worst method, Consistency, Convex optimisation, Linear Programming, Linearization, Mixed-integer linear programming, Model approximation, Multiple-criterion optimisation",
author = "D.J.C. Beemsterboer and E.M.T. Hendrix and G.D.H. Claassen",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.218",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "1660--1665",
journal = "IFAC-PapersOnLine",
issn = "2405-8963",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "11",

}

On solving the Best-Worst Method in multi-criteria decision-making. / Beemsterboer, D.J.C.; Hendrix, E.M.T.; Claassen, G.D.H.

In: IFAC-PapersOnLine, Vol. 51, No. 11, 01.01.2018, p. 1660-1665.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - On solving the Best-Worst Method in multi-criteria decision-making⁎

AU - Beemsterboer, D.J.C.

AU - Hendrix, E.M.T.

AU - Claassen, G.D.H.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Decision-making often refers to ranking alternatives based on many involved criteria. Since the introduction of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in 1980, pairwise comparisons of criteria have a long tradition in multi-criteria decision-making. One of the main concerns of the AHP refers to the inconsistency of decision makers in pairwise comparisons. Recently, the Best-Worst Method (BWM) was introduced to reduce the inconsistency by a concept that needs substantially less pairwise comparisons. The BWM includes solving a non-linear model (NLM) to derive the weights from the comparisons. A linear model (LM) was introduced in a follow-up to approximate the original NLM. This paper shows that the optimal weights of the proposed linear model (LM) may differ substantially from the optimal weights of the original NLM model. Moreover, this paper provides an MILP model approximation (MILM) which can be solved by standard optimization software and illustrates that its solution approximates the optimal weights of the original NLM model arbitrarily close. Since consistency in pairwise comparisons is usually not self-evident in practice, using approximation MILM to derive unique solutions of the original NLM, extends the applicability of the Best-Worst Method.

AB - Decision-making often refers to ranking alternatives based on many involved criteria. Since the introduction of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in 1980, pairwise comparisons of criteria have a long tradition in multi-criteria decision-making. One of the main concerns of the AHP refers to the inconsistency of decision makers in pairwise comparisons. Recently, the Best-Worst Method (BWM) was introduced to reduce the inconsistency by a concept that needs substantially less pairwise comparisons. The BWM includes solving a non-linear model (NLM) to derive the weights from the comparisons. A linear model (LM) was introduced in a follow-up to approximate the original NLM. This paper shows that the optimal weights of the proposed linear model (LM) may differ substantially from the optimal weights of the original NLM model. Moreover, this paper provides an MILP model approximation (MILM) which can be solved by standard optimization software and illustrates that its solution approximates the optimal weights of the original NLM model arbitrarily close. Since consistency in pairwise comparisons is usually not self-evident in practice, using approximation MILM to derive unique solutions of the original NLM, extends the applicability of the Best-Worst Method.

KW - Best-worst method

KW - Consistency

KW - Convex optimisation

KW - Linear Programming

KW - Linearization

KW - Mixed-integer linear programming

KW - Model approximation

KW - Multiple-criterion optimisation

U2 - 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.218

DO - 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.218

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 1660

EP - 1665

JO - IFAC-PapersOnLine

T2 - IFAC-PapersOnLine

JF - IFAC-PapersOnLine

SN - 2405-8963

IS - 11

ER -