On Marx’s human significance, Harvey’s right to the city, and Nussbaum’s capability approach

C. Basta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, I juxtapose David Harvey’s idea of the ‘right to the city’ and Martha Nussbaum’s central human capability of ‘control over one’s environment’, and I approach them from the perspective of their mutual convergence on Marx’s conception of human significance. In particular,
I compare how Marx’s conception reverberates in Harvey’s right to the city as human right and in Nussbaum’s control over the environment as central human capability. I discuss how the language of capabilities through which the latter scholar articulates her political liberalism offers ‘important supplementations’ to the language of human rights through which the former scholar articulates his critical discourse. I conclude that the evaluative character of Nussbaum’s capability approach could advance a novel stream in planning theory centred on human development. To elaborate on such potential, I propose the notion of people’s ‘urban functionings’, and I discuss how this notion could provide new interpretative lenses through which to renew the idea of ‘right to the city’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345-363
JournalPlanning Theory
Volume16
Issue number4
Early online date6 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

human rights
planning theory
language
liberalism
discourse
city

Cite this

@article{897817e0e8a4497ba4cd6d48895c8f5e,
title = "On Marx’s human significance, Harvey’s right to the city, and Nussbaum’s capability approach",
abstract = "In this article, I juxtapose David Harvey’s idea of the ‘right to the city’ and Martha Nussbaum’s central human capability of ‘control over one’s environment’, and I approach them from the perspective of their mutual convergence on Marx’s conception of human significance. In particular,I compare how Marx’s conception reverberates in Harvey’s right to the city as human right and in Nussbaum’s control over the environment as central human capability. I discuss how the language of capabilities through which the latter scholar articulates her political liberalism offers ‘important supplementations’ to the language of human rights through which the former scholar articulates his critical discourse. I conclude that the evaluative character of Nussbaum’s capability approach could advance a novel stream in planning theory centred on human development. To elaborate on such potential, I propose the notion of people’s ‘urban functionings’, and I discuss how this notion could provide new interpretative lenses through which to renew the idea of ‘right to the city’.",
author = "C. Basta",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1473095216641153",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "345--363",
journal = "Planning Theory",
issn = "1473-0952",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

On Marx’s human significance, Harvey’s right to the city, and Nussbaum’s capability approach. / Basta, C.

In: Planning Theory, Vol. 16, No. 4, 01.11.2017, p. 345-363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - On Marx’s human significance, Harvey’s right to the city, and Nussbaum’s capability approach

AU - Basta, C.

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - In this article, I juxtapose David Harvey’s idea of the ‘right to the city’ and Martha Nussbaum’s central human capability of ‘control over one’s environment’, and I approach them from the perspective of their mutual convergence on Marx’s conception of human significance. In particular,I compare how Marx’s conception reverberates in Harvey’s right to the city as human right and in Nussbaum’s control over the environment as central human capability. I discuss how the language of capabilities through which the latter scholar articulates her political liberalism offers ‘important supplementations’ to the language of human rights through which the former scholar articulates his critical discourse. I conclude that the evaluative character of Nussbaum’s capability approach could advance a novel stream in planning theory centred on human development. To elaborate on such potential, I propose the notion of people’s ‘urban functionings’, and I discuss how this notion could provide new interpretative lenses through which to renew the idea of ‘right to the city’.

AB - In this article, I juxtapose David Harvey’s idea of the ‘right to the city’ and Martha Nussbaum’s central human capability of ‘control over one’s environment’, and I approach them from the perspective of their mutual convergence on Marx’s conception of human significance. In particular,I compare how Marx’s conception reverberates in Harvey’s right to the city as human right and in Nussbaum’s control over the environment as central human capability. I discuss how the language of capabilities through which the latter scholar articulates her political liberalism offers ‘important supplementations’ to the language of human rights through which the former scholar articulates his critical discourse. I conclude that the evaluative character of Nussbaum’s capability approach could advance a novel stream in planning theory centred on human development. To elaborate on such potential, I propose the notion of people’s ‘urban functionings’, and I discuss how this notion could provide new interpretative lenses through which to renew the idea of ‘right to the city’.

U2 - 10.1177/1473095216641153

DO - 10.1177/1473095216641153

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 345

EP - 363

JO - Planning Theory

JF - Planning Theory

SN - 1473-0952

IS - 4

ER -