On-farm trials as 'infection points'? a response to Wall et al.

J.A. Andersson; T.J. Krupnik; N. De Roo

doi:10.1017/S0014479718000509

On-farm trials as 'infection points'? a response to Wall et al.

J.A. Andersson^*
, T.J. Krupnik
, N. De Roo

^*Corresponding author for this work

Knowledge Technology and Innovation

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In their response to our paper on the problems of using on-farm trials in efforts to scale-out new crop production technologies and practices among smallholder farmers, Wall et al. (2018) focus on our descriptions of on-farm trials in just one of the three case studies of Agricultural Research for Development (AR4D) projects that were presented. They argue we did not understand the projects' philosophy and that the biases in farmer and site selection we discussed, do not exist in the southern Africa case study.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	195-199
Journal	Experimental Agriculture
Volume	55
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479718000509
Publication status	Published - 30 Jan 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 2 Zero Hunger

Access to Document

10.1017/S0014479718000509

Cite this

@article{59795a34faec421a8dff02047889e2af,

title = "On-farm trials as 'infection points'? a response to Wall et al.",

abstract = "In their response to our paper on the problems of using on-farm trials in efforts to scale-out new crop production technologies and practices among smallholder farmers, Wall et al. (2018) focus on our descriptions of on-farm trials in just one of the three case studies of Agricultural Research for Development (AR4D) projects that were presented. They argue we did not understand the projects' philosophy and that the biases in farmer and site selection we discussed, do not exist in the southern Africa case study.",

author = "J.A. Andersson and T.J. Krupnik and \{De Roo\}, N.",

year = "2019",

month = jan,

day = "30",

doi = "10.1017/S0014479718000509",

language = "English",

volume = "55",

pages = "195--199",

journal = "Experimental Agriculture",

issn = "0014-4797",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On-farm trials as 'infection points'? a response to Wall et al.

AU - Andersson, J.A.

AU - Krupnik, T.J.

AU - De Roo, N.

PY - 2019/1/30

Y1 - 2019/1/30

N2 - In their response to our paper on the problems of using on-farm trials in efforts to scale-out new crop production technologies and practices among smallholder farmers, Wall et al. (2018) focus on our descriptions of on-farm trials in just one of the three case studies of Agricultural Research for Development (AR4D) projects that were presented. They argue we did not understand the projects' philosophy and that the biases in farmer and site selection we discussed, do not exist in the southern Africa case study.

AB - In their response to our paper on the problems of using on-farm trials in efforts to scale-out new crop production technologies and practices among smallholder farmers, Wall et al. (2018) focus on our descriptions of on-farm trials in just one of the three case studies of Agricultural Research for Development (AR4D) projects that were presented. They argue we did not understand the projects' philosophy and that the biases in farmer and site selection we discussed, do not exist in the southern Africa case study.

U2 - 10.1017/S0014479718000509

DO - 10.1017/S0014479718000509

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85060893775

SN - 0014-4797

VL - 55

SP - 195

EP - 199

JO - Experimental Agriculture

JF - Experimental Agriculture

IS - 2

ER -

On-farm trials as 'infection points'? a response to Wall et al.

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this