On-farm trials as 'infection points'? a response to Wall et al.

J.A. Andersson*, T.J. Krupnik, N. De Roo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In their response to our paper on the problems of using on-farm trials in efforts to scale-out new crop production technologies and practices among smallholder farmers, Wall et al. (2018) focus on our descriptions of on-farm trials in just one of the three case studies of Agricultural Research for Development (AR4D) projects that were presented. They argue we did not understand the projects' philosophy and that the biases in farmer and site selection we discussed, do not exist in the southern Africa case study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)195-199
JournalExperimental Agriculture
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On-farm trials as 'infection points'? a response to Wall et al.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this