Nitrogen availability and susceptibility of tomato leaves to Botrytis cinerea

E. Hoffland, M.L. van Beusichem, M.J. Jeger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

82 Citations (Scopus)


The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of nitrogen availability on susceptibility of tomato leaves to the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Plants with varying nitrogen availability were grown by adding N daily in exponentially increasing amounts to a nutrient solution at different rates. Leaves of plants grown at low nitrogen availability had a high leaf C/N ratio (21 g g-1) and were about 2.5 times more susceptible to primary lesion formation by B. cinerea compared to plant grown at high nitrogen availability, which had a low leaf C/N ratio (11 g g-1). Leaf C/N ratio accounted for 95% of variation in susceptibility. This relationship between C/N ratio and susceptibility persisted when plants were grown with exponential P addition and optimal N supply, and was thus independent of plant growth rate or related factors. We could not explain the effect of nitrogen availability by variation in the most obvious N-based resistance compound α-tomatine because more susceptible leaves with a high C/N ratio contained more α-tomatine. These leaves also contained more soluble carbohydrates. The level of soluble carbohydrates correlated positively with susceptibility, independent of the growth method. We therefore suggest that the effect of N availability on susceptibility must be explained by variation in levels of soluble carbohydrates and speculate about the role of these carbohydrates in the infection process.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)263-272
JournalPlant and Soil
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1999


  • α-tomatine
  • Botrytis cinema
  • Lycopersicon esculentum
  • Nitrogen availability
  • Pathogen resistance
  • Relative growth rate


Dive into the research topics of 'Nitrogen availability and susceptibility of tomato leaves to Botrytis cinerea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this