New EU Legislation for risk assessment of GM food: no scientific justification for mandatory animal feeding trails

H.A. Kuiper, E.J. Kok, H.V. Davies

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademicpeer-review

    31 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This commentary focuses on the potential added value of and need for (sub)-chronic testing of whole genetically modified (GM) foods in rodents to assess their safety. Such routine testing should not be required since, due to apparent weaknesses in the approach, it does not add to current risk assessment of GM foods. Moreover, the demand for routine testing using animals is in conflict with the European Union (EU) Commission's efforts to reduce animal experimentation. Regulating agencies in the EU are invited to respect the sound scientific principles applied to the risk assessment of foods derived from GM plants and not to interfere in the risk assessment by introducing extra requirements based on pseudo-scientific or political considerations
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)781-784
    Number of pages4
    JournalPlant Biotechnology Journal
    Volume11
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Keywords

    • long-term
    • varieties
    • maize

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'New EU Legislation for risk assessment of GM food: no scientific justification for mandatory animal feeding trails'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this