Nestling immunocompetence and testosterone covary with brood size in a songbird

Marc Naguib*, Katharina Riebel, Alfonso Marzal, Diego Gil

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

105 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The social and ecological conditions that individuals experience during early development have marked effects on their developmental trajectory. In songbirds, brood size is a key environmental factor affecting development, and experimental increases in brood size have been shown to have negative effects on growth, condition and fitness. Possible causes of decreased growth in chicks from enlarged broods are nutritional stress, crowding and increased social competition, i.e. environmental factors known to affect adult steroid levels (especially of testosterone and corticosteroids) in mammals and birds. Little, however, is known about environmental effects on steroid synthesis in nestlings. We addressed this question by following the development of zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) chicks that were cross-fostered and raised in different brood sizes. In line with previous findings, nestling growth and cell-mediated immunocompetence were negatively affected by brood size. Moreover, nestling testosterone levels covaried with treatment: plasma testosterone increased with experimental brood size. This result provides experimental evidence that levels of circulating testosterone in nestlings can be influenced by their physiological response to environmental conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)833-838
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume271
Issue number1541
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Apr 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Challenge hypothesis
  • Immunocompetence
  • Nutritional stress
  • Sibling competition
  • Testosterone
  • Zebra finch

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nestling immunocompetence and testosterone covary with brood size in a songbird'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this