Abstract
Responsible innovation requires mutual responsiveness between
various stakeholders around technological innovation. But in public engagement
exercises, concerns about ethical, cultural and political impacts are too easily set
aside, so that no one is actually encouraged to discuss responsibilities for these
impacts. A typical example in the field of food innovation is the consumer’s recurring
concern for natural food. In discussions, both consumers and engineers tend
to consider the meaning of naturalness as subjective and private. In this chapter,
we present an interdisciplinary design tool for public engagement that is more
hospitable to such concerns, based on the Discursive Action Method and Techno-
Ethical Imagination. We describe the advancements we made and the obstacles
we faced when applying this tool in two dialogue workshops on novel foods and
naturalness.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Responsible Innovation 2. Concepts, approaches, and applications |
Editors | B.J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, J. Van den Hoven |
Place of Publication | Cham |
Publisher | Springer |
Pages | 161-181 |
Number of pages | 303 |
ISBN (Print) | 9783319173078 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- Conversation analysis
- Food technology
- Naturalness
- Responsiveness
- Soft concerns
- Stakeholder dialogue
- Techno-ethical imagination