Natural capital must be defended: green growth as neoliberal biopolitics

Robert Fletcher, Wolfram H. Dressler, Zachary R. Anderson, Bram Büscher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This contribution addresses the growing global trend to promote ‘natural capital accounting’ (NCA) in support of environmental conservation. NCA seeks to harness the economic value of conserved nature to incentivize local resource users to forgo the opportunity costs of extractive activities. We suggest that this represents a form of neoliberal biopower/biopolitics seeking to defend life by demonstrating its ‘profitability’ and hence right to exist. While little finance actually reaches communities through this strategy, substantial funding still flows into the idea of ‘natural capital’ as the basis of improving rural livelihoods. Drawing on two cases in Southeast Asia, we show that NCA initiatives may compel some local people to value ecosystem services in financial terms, yet in most cases this perspective remains partial and fragmented in communities where such initiatives produce a range of unintended outcomes. When the envisioned environmental markets fail to develop and benefits remain largely intangible, NCA fails to meet the growing material aspirations of farmers while also offering little if any bulwark against their using forests more intensively and/or enrolling in lucrative extractive enterprise. We thus conclude that NCA in practice may become the antithesis of conservation by actually encouraging the resource extraction it intends to combat.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-28
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Peasant Studies
Volume46
Issue number5
Early online date24 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2019

Fingerprint

conservation
biotechnology policy
opportunity costs
economic value
profitability
Southeast Asia
resources
livelihood
community
Conservation
Resources
Biopolitics
finance
farmer
funding
market
trend
Costs
Finance
Biopower

Keywords

  • biopower
  • conservation
  • environmental markets
  • Natural capital
  • neoliberalism

Cite this

Fletcher, Robert ; Dressler, Wolfram H. ; Anderson, Zachary R. ; Büscher, Bram. / Natural capital must be defended: green growth as neoliberal biopolitics. In: Journal of Peasant Studies. 2019 ; Vol. 46, No. 5. pp. 1-28.
@article{64ab2c05dd3c45fcb970d885f7718839,
title = "Natural capital must be defended: green growth as neoliberal biopolitics",
abstract = "This contribution addresses the growing global trend to promote ‘natural capital accounting’ (NCA) in support of environmental conservation. NCA seeks to harness the economic value of conserved nature to incentivize local resource users to forgo the opportunity costs of extractive activities. We suggest that this represents a form of neoliberal biopower/biopolitics seeking to defend life by demonstrating its ‘profitability’ and hence right to exist. While little finance actually reaches communities through this strategy, substantial funding still flows into the idea of ‘natural capital’ as the basis of improving rural livelihoods. Drawing on two cases in Southeast Asia, we show that NCA initiatives may compel some local people to value ecosystem services in financial terms, yet in most cases this perspective remains partial and fragmented in communities where such initiatives produce a range of unintended outcomes. When the envisioned environmental markets fail to develop and benefits remain largely intangible, NCA fails to meet the growing material aspirations of farmers while also offering little if any bulwark against their using forests more intensively and/or enrolling in lucrative extractive enterprise. We thus conclude that NCA in practice may become the antithesis of conservation by actually encouraging the resource extraction it intends to combat.",
keywords = "biopower, conservation, environmental markets, Natural capital, neoliberalism",
author = "Robert Fletcher and Dressler, {Wolfram H.} and Anderson, {Zachary R.} and Bram B{\"u}scher",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1080/03066150.2018.1428953",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "1--28",
journal = "The Journal of Peasant Studies",
issn = "0306-6150",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "5",

}

Natural capital must be defended: green growth as neoliberal biopolitics. / Fletcher, Robert; Dressler, Wolfram H.; Anderson, Zachary R.; Büscher, Bram.

In: Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 46, No. 5, 05.2019, p. 1-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Natural capital must be defended: green growth as neoliberal biopolitics

AU - Fletcher, Robert

AU - Dressler, Wolfram H.

AU - Anderson, Zachary R.

AU - Büscher, Bram

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - This contribution addresses the growing global trend to promote ‘natural capital accounting’ (NCA) in support of environmental conservation. NCA seeks to harness the economic value of conserved nature to incentivize local resource users to forgo the opportunity costs of extractive activities. We suggest that this represents a form of neoliberal biopower/biopolitics seeking to defend life by demonstrating its ‘profitability’ and hence right to exist. While little finance actually reaches communities through this strategy, substantial funding still flows into the idea of ‘natural capital’ as the basis of improving rural livelihoods. Drawing on two cases in Southeast Asia, we show that NCA initiatives may compel some local people to value ecosystem services in financial terms, yet in most cases this perspective remains partial and fragmented in communities where such initiatives produce a range of unintended outcomes. When the envisioned environmental markets fail to develop and benefits remain largely intangible, NCA fails to meet the growing material aspirations of farmers while also offering little if any bulwark against their using forests more intensively and/or enrolling in lucrative extractive enterprise. We thus conclude that NCA in practice may become the antithesis of conservation by actually encouraging the resource extraction it intends to combat.

AB - This contribution addresses the growing global trend to promote ‘natural capital accounting’ (NCA) in support of environmental conservation. NCA seeks to harness the economic value of conserved nature to incentivize local resource users to forgo the opportunity costs of extractive activities. We suggest that this represents a form of neoliberal biopower/biopolitics seeking to defend life by demonstrating its ‘profitability’ and hence right to exist. While little finance actually reaches communities through this strategy, substantial funding still flows into the idea of ‘natural capital’ as the basis of improving rural livelihoods. Drawing on two cases in Southeast Asia, we show that NCA initiatives may compel some local people to value ecosystem services in financial terms, yet in most cases this perspective remains partial and fragmented in communities where such initiatives produce a range of unintended outcomes. When the envisioned environmental markets fail to develop and benefits remain largely intangible, NCA fails to meet the growing material aspirations of farmers while also offering little if any bulwark against their using forests more intensively and/or enrolling in lucrative extractive enterprise. We thus conclude that NCA in practice may become the antithesis of conservation by actually encouraging the resource extraction it intends to combat.

KW - biopower

KW - conservation

KW - environmental markets

KW - Natural capital

KW - neoliberalism

U2 - 10.1080/03066150.2018.1428953

DO - 10.1080/03066150.2018.1428953

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 1

EP - 28

JO - The Journal of Peasant Studies

JF - The Journal of Peasant Studies

SN - 0306-6150

IS - 5

ER -