TY - JOUR
T1 - Moving beyond the MSY concept to reflect multidimensional fisheries management objectives
AU - Rindorf, Anna
AU - Mumford, John
AU - Baranowski, Paul
AU - Clausen, Lotte Worsøe
AU - García, Dorleta
AU - Hintzen, Niels T.
AU - Kempf, Alexander
AU - Leach, Adrian
AU - Levontin, Polina
AU - Mace, Pamela
AU - Mackinson, Steven
AU - Maravelias, Christos
AU - Prellezo, Raúl
AU - Quetglas, Antoni
AU - Tserpes, George
AU - Voss, Rüdiger
AU - Reid, David G.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Maximising the long term average catch of single stock fisheries as prescribed by the globally-legislated MSY objective is unlikely to ensure ecosystem, economic, social and governance sustainability unless an effort is made to explicitly include these considerations. We investigated how objectives to be maximised can be combined with sustainability constraints aiming specifically at one or more of these four sustainability pillars. The study was conducted as a three-year interactive process involving 290 participating science, industry, NGO and management representatives from six different European regions. Economic considerations and inclusive governance were generally preferred as the key objectives to be maximised in complex fisheries, recognising that ecosystem, social and governance constraints are also key aspects of sustainability in all regions. Relative preferences differed between regions and cases but were similar across a series of workshops, different levels of information provided and the form of elicitation methods used as long as major shifts in context or stakeholder composition did not occur. Maximising inclusiveness in governance, particularly the inclusiveness of affected stakeholders, was highly preferred by participants across the project. This suggests that advice incorporating flexibility in the interpretation of objectives to leave room for meaningful inclusiveness in decision-making processes is likely to be a prerequisite for stakeholder buy-in to management decisions.
AB - Maximising the long term average catch of single stock fisheries as prescribed by the globally-legislated MSY objective is unlikely to ensure ecosystem, economic, social and governance sustainability unless an effort is made to explicitly include these considerations. We investigated how objectives to be maximised can be combined with sustainability constraints aiming specifically at one or more of these four sustainability pillars. The study was conducted as a three-year interactive process involving 290 participating science, industry, NGO and management representatives from six different European regions. Economic considerations and inclusive governance were generally preferred as the key objectives to be maximised in complex fisheries, recognising that ecosystem, social and governance constraints are also key aspects of sustainability in all regions. Relative preferences differed between regions and cases but were similar across a series of workshops, different levels of information provided and the form of elicitation methods used as long as major shifts in context or stakeholder composition did not occur. Maximising inclusiveness in governance, particularly the inclusiveness of affected stakeholders, was highly preferred by participants across the project. This suggests that advice incorporating flexibility in the interpretation of objectives to leave room for meaningful inclusiveness in decision-making processes is likely to be a prerequisite for stakeholder buy-in to management decisions.
KW - Inclusive governance
KW - Management objectives
KW - MEY
KW - MSOY
KW - MSY
KW - Sustainability pillars
U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.012
DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85027557029
SN - 0308-597X
VL - 85
SP - 33
EP - 41
JO - Marine Policy
JF - Marine Policy
ER -