Modernisation and African farmer-led irrigation development: Ideology, policies and practices

Chris de Bont, Janwillem Liebrand, Gert Jan Veldwisch, Philip Woodhouse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In both Mozambique and Tanzania, farmer-led development of irrigation is widespread, yet it is little recognised in irrigation policies and is under-supported by the government. This paper explores how this situation is exacerbated by modernisation ideas in irrigation policy and professional thinking. By means of a historical review, we trace modernisation thinking in irrigation development from the colonial period onwards, and analyse how this thinking continues to play out in contemporary irrigation policies in both countries. We then examine the relationship between modernisation thinking and practices of farmer-led irrigation development, drawing on policy documents, field studies, and interviews in both countries. Based on this analysis, we argue that the nature of farmer-led development of irrigation is consistent with many of the goals identified by state agricultural modernisation programmes, but not with the means by which government and state policies envisage their achievement. As a consequence, policies and state officials tend to screen out farmers' irrigation initiatives as not relevant to development until they are brought within state-sanctioned processes of technical design and administration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-128
Number of pages22
JournalWater Alternatives
Volume12
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

ideology
irrigation
modernization
farmer
government and state
policy
Mozambique
Tanzania
interview

Keywords

  • Agriculture
  • Farmer-led irrigation development
  • Modernisation
  • Mozambique
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Tanzania

Cite this

de Bont, Chris ; Liebrand, Janwillem ; Veldwisch, Gert Jan ; Woodhouse, Philip. / Modernisation and African farmer-led irrigation development : Ideology, policies and practices. In: Water Alternatives. 2019 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 107-128.
@article{27827a85055b469ea39ceabd16dcbb2f,
title = "Modernisation and African farmer-led irrigation development: Ideology, policies and practices",
abstract = "In both Mozambique and Tanzania, farmer-led development of irrigation is widespread, yet it is little recognised in irrigation policies and is under-supported by the government. This paper explores how this situation is exacerbated by modernisation ideas in irrigation policy and professional thinking. By means of a historical review, we trace modernisation thinking in irrigation development from the colonial period onwards, and analyse how this thinking continues to play out in contemporary irrigation policies in both countries. We then examine the relationship between modernisation thinking and practices of farmer-led irrigation development, drawing on policy documents, field studies, and interviews in both countries. Based on this analysis, we argue that the nature of farmer-led development of irrigation is consistent with many of the goals identified by state agricultural modernisation programmes, but not with the means by which government and state policies envisage their achievement. As a consequence, policies and state officials tend to screen out farmers' irrigation initiatives as not relevant to development until they are brought within state-sanctioned processes of technical design and administration.",
keywords = "Agriculture, Farmer-led irrigation development, Modernisation, Mozambique, Sub-Saharan Africa, Tanzania",
author = "{de Bont}, Chris and Janwillem Liebrand and Veldwisch, {Gert Jan} and Philip Woodhouse",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "107--128",
journal = "Water Alternatives",
issn = "1965-0175",
publisher = "Water Alternatives Association",
number = "1",

}

Modernisation and African farmer-led irrigation development : Ideology, policies and practices. / de Bont, Chris; Liebrand, Janwillem; Veldwisch, Gert Jan; Woodhouse, Philip.

In: Water Alternatives, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 107-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modernisation and African farmer-led irrigation development

T2 - Ideology, policies and practices

AU - de Bont, Chris

AU - Liebrand, Janwillem

AU - Veldwisch, Gert Jan

AU - Woodhouse, Philip

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - In both Mozambique and Tanzania, farmer-led development of irrigation is widespread, yet it is little recognised in irrigation policies and is under-supported by the government. This paper explores how this situation is exacerbated by modernisation ideas in irrigation policy and professional thinking. By means of a historical review, we trace modernisation thinking in irrigation development from the colonial period onwards, and analyse how this thinking continues to play out in contemporary irrigation policies in both countries. We then examine the relationship between modernisation thinking and practices of farmer-led irrigation development, drawing on policy documents, field studies, and interviews in both countries. Based on this analysis, we argue that the nature of farmer-led development of irrigation is consistent with many of the goals identified by state agricultural modernisation programmes, but not with the means by which government and state policies envisage their achievement. As a consequence, policies and state officials tend to screen out farmers' irrigation initiatives as not relevant to development until they are brought within state-sanctioned processes of technical design and administration.

AB - In both Mozambique and Tanzania, farmer-led development of irrigation is widespread, yet it is little recognised in irrigation policies and is under-supported by the government. This paper explores how this situation is exacerbated by modernisation ideas in irrigation policy and professional thinking. By means of a historical review, we trace modernisation thinking in irrigation development from the colonial period onwards, and analyse how this thinking continues to play out in contemporary irrigation policies in both countries. We then examine the relationship between modernisation thinking and practices of farmer-led irrigation development, drawing on policy documents, field studies, and interviews in both countries. Based on this analysis, we argue that the nature of farmer-led development of irrigation is consistent with many of the goals identified by state agricultural modernisation programmes, but not with the means by which government and state policies envisage their achievement. As a consequence, policies and state officials tend to screen out farmers' irrigation initiatives as not relevant to development until they are brought within state-sanctioned processes of technical design and administration.

KW - Agriculture

KW - Farmer-led irrigation development

KW - Modernisation

KW - Mozambique

KW - Sub-Saharan Africa

KW - Tanzania

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 107

EP - 128

JO - Water Alternatives

JF - Water Alternatives

SN - 1965-0175

IS - 1

ER -