Modelling crop transpiration in greenhouses: Different models for different applications

Nikolaos Katsoulas*, Cecilia Stanghellini

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Models for the evapotranspiration of greenhouse crops are needed both for accurate irrigation and for the simulation or management of the greenhouse climate. For this purpose, several evapotranspiration models have been developed and presented, all based on the Penman–Monteith approach, the “big-leaf” model. So, on the one hand, relatively simple models have been developed for irrigation scheduling purposes, and on the other, “knowledge–mechanistic” models have been developed for climate control purposes. These models differ in the amount of detail about variables, such as stomatal and aerodynamic conductance. The aim of this review paper is to present the variables and parameters affecting greenhouse crop transpiration, and to analyze and discuss the existing models for its simulation. The common sub-models used for the simulation of crop transpiration in greenhouses (aerodynamic and stomatal conductances, and intercepted radiation) are evaluated. The worth of the multilayer models for the simulation of the mass and energy exchanges between crops and air are also analyzed and discussed. Following the presentation of the different models and approaches, it is obvious that the different applications for which these models have been developed entail varying requirements to the models, so that they cannot always be compared. Models developed in different locations (high–low latitudes or for closed or highly ventilated greenhouses) are discussed, and their sensitivity to different parameters is presented.

Original languageEnglish
Article number392
JournalAgronomy
Volume9
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

transpiration
greenhouses
crops
aerodynamics
evapotranspiration
simulation models
climate
irrigation scheduling
energy transfer
stomatal conductance
irrigation
air

Keywords

  • Aerodynamic conductance
  • Big-leaf approach
  • Greenhouse coupling
  • Irrigation
  • Latent heat
  • Stomatal conductance
  • Water use efficiency

Cite this

@article{186375f94c334b97b85195ae6dd0de9e,
title = "Modelling crop transpiration in greenhouses: Different models for different applications",
abstract = "Models for the evapotranspiration of greenhouse crops are needed both for accurate irrigation and for the simulation or management of the greenhouse climate. For this purpose, several evapotranspiration models have been developed and presented, all based on the Penman–Monteith approach, the “big-leaf” model. So, on the one hand, relatively simple models have been developed for irrigation scheduling purposes, and on the other, “knowledge–mechanistic” models have been developed for climate control purposes. These models differ in the amount of detail about variables, such as stomatal and aerodynamic conductance. The aim of this review paper is to present the variables and parameters affecting greenhouse crop transpiration, and to analyze and discuss the existing models for its simulation. The common sub-models used for the simulation of crop transpiration in greenhouses (aerodynamic and stomatal conductances, and intercepted radiation) are evaluated. The worth of the multilayer models for the simulation of the mass and energy exchanges between crops and air are also analyzed and discussed. Following the presentation of the different models and approaches, it is obvious that the different applications for which these models have been developed entail varying requirements to the models, so that they cannot always be compared. Models developed in different locations (high–low latitudes or for closed or highly ventilated greenhouses) are discussed, and their sensitivity to different parameters is presented.",
keywords = "Aerodynamic conductance, Big-leaf approach, Greenhouse coupling, Irrigation, Latent heat, Stomatal conductance, Water use efficiency",
author = "Nikolaos Katsoulas and Cecilia Stanghellini",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "17",
doi = "10.3390/agronomy9070392",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Agronomy",
issn = "2073-4395",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "7",

}

Modelling crop transpiration in greenhouses: Different models for different applications. / Katsoulas, Nikolaos; Stanghellini, Cecilia.

In: Agronomy, Vol. 9, No. 7, 392, 17.07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modelling crop transpiration in greenhouses: Different models for different applications

AU - Katsoulas, Nikolaos

AU - Stanghellini, Cecilia

PY - 2019/7/17

Y1 - 2019/7/17

N2 - Models for the evapotranspiration of greenhouse crops are needed both for accurate irrigation and for the simulation or management of the greenhouse climate. For this purpose, several evapotranspiration models have been developed and presented, all based on the Penman–Monteith approach, the “big-leaf” model. So, on the one hand, relatively simple models have been developed for irrigation scheduling purposes, and on the other, “knowledge–mechanistic” models have been developed for climate control purposes. These models differ in the amount of detail about variables, such as stomatal and aerodynamic conductance. The aim of this review paper is to present the variables and parameters affecting greenhouse crop transpiration, and to analyze and discuss the existing models for its simulation. The common sub-models used for the simulation of crop transpiration in greenhouses (aerodynamic and stomatal conductances, and intercepted radiation) are evaluated. The worth of the multilayer models for the simulation of the mass and energy exchanges between crops and air are also analyzed and discussed. Following the presentation of the different models and approaches, it is obvious that the different applications for which these models have been developed entail varying requirements to the models, so that they cannot always be compared. Models developed in different locations (high–low latitudes or for closed or highly ventilated greenhouses) are discussed, and their sensitivity to different parameters is presented.

AB - Models for the evapotranspiration of greenhouse crops are needed both for accurate irrigation and for the simulation or management of the greenhouse climate. For this purpose, several evapotranspiration models have been developed and presented, all based on the Penman–Monteith approach, the “big-leaf” model. So, on the one hand, relatively simple models have been developed for irrigation scheduling purposes, and on the other, “knowledge–mechanistic” models have been developed for climate control purposes. These models differ in the amount of detail about variables, such as stomatal and aerodynamic conductance. The aim of this review paper is to present the variables and parameters affecting greenhouse crop transpiration, and to analyze and discuss the existing models for its simulation. The common sub-models used for the simulation of crop transpiration in greenhouses (aerodynamic and stomatal conductances, and intercepted radiation) are evaluated. The worth of the multilayer models for the simulation of the mass and energy exchanges between crops and air are also analyzed and discussed. Following the presentation of the different models and approaches, it is obvious that the different applications for which these models have been developed entail varying requirements to the models, so that they cannot always be compared. Models developed in different locations (high–low latitudes or for closed or highly ventilated greenhouses) are discussed, and their sensitivity to different parameters is presented.

KW - Aerodynamic conductance

KW - Big-leaf approach

KW - Greenhouse coupling

KW - Irrigation

KW - Latent heat

KW - Stomatal conductance

KW - Water use efficiency

U2 - 10.3390/agronomy9070392

DO - 10.3390/agronomy9070392

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Agronomy

JF - Agronomy

SN - 2073-4395

IS - 7

M1 - 392

ER -