Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Miracle Seeds: Biased Expectations, Complementary Input Use, and the Dynamics of Smallholder Technology Adoption

  • Caroline Miehe*
  • , Leocardia Nabwire*
  • , Robert Sparrow
  • , David J. Spielman*
  • , Bjorn Van Campenhout*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

To fully benefit from new agricultural technologies such as improved seed varieties, significant investment in complementary inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides and practices such as systematic planting, irrigation, and weeding are also required. Farmers may fail to recognize the importance of these complements, leading to disappointing crop yields and outputs and, eventually, dis-adoption of the improved variety. Using a field experiment, we test an information intervention among smallholder maize farmers in eastern Uganda that points out these complementarities. We find that farmers adopt less after they have been sensitized about the need to use complementary inputs to unlock the adoption premium. We rationalize this finding with a simple theoretical model where farmers have misspecified mental models of the technology production function and conclude that most farmers in our sample do indeed believe in miracle seeds.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)305-334
Number of pages30
JournalEconomic Development and Cultural Change
Volume74
Issue number1
Early online dateOct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Miracle Seeds: Biased Expectations, Complementary Input Use, and the Dynamics of Smallholder Technology Adoption'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this