TY - JOUR
T1 - Migration patterns and hybridization within the Asian stonechat complex in response to a major geographical barrier
AU - Zhao, Tianhao
AU - Anisimov, Yury
AU - Heim, Wieland
AU - Song, Gang
AU - Anisimova, Valentina
AU - Batbayar, Nyambayar
AU - Bossu, Christen M.
AU - Bours, Andrea
AU - Chen, Siqiao
AU - Chen, Wenjia
AU - Davaasuren, Batmunkh
AU - Dule, null
AU - Jiao, Shengjing
AU - Jiao, Xiaolu
AU - Hellström, Magnus
AU - Langebrake, Georg
AU - Li, Zhuo
AU - Liao, Shu-Yueh
AU - Liu, Aitao
AU - Liu, Zongzhuang
AU - Roved, Jacob
AU - Wang, Xinyuan
AU - Weissensteiner, Matthias H.
AU - Wen, Guannan
AU - Zhang, Dezhi
AU - Zhang, Guoming
AU - Zhang, Yifang
AU - Ruegg, Kristen
AU - Liedvogel, Miriam
AU - Bensch, Staffan
AU - Wertheim, Bregje
AU - Lei, Fumin
AU - Helm, Barbara
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Facing geographical barriers, phenotypic responses of migratory landbirds may differ even between closely related taxa: some may bypass barriers while others cross them. Such phenotypic variation can arise from different genetic backgrounds and lead to different adaptive processes. A classic example is migratory divide, i.e., breeding ranges where different migration-route phenotypes co-exist or meet. Such variation can facilitate an understanding of the evolutionary background of migration and responses to barriers. In Asia, a migratory divide has been suggested in response to the major landscape, the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) for 2 stonechat taxa (Siberian stonechat Saxicola maurus maurus and Amur stonechat S. stejnegeri). Detouring along either side of the QTP, these taxa are believed to disfavor crossing over the highland. However, the Tibetan stonechat (S. m. przewalskii), breeding on the QTP, may differ in its barrier response due to possible adaptation to high elevation. To investigate migration patterns and potentially associated genetic differences, we studied migration routes and population genetics of populations around the assumed migratory divide in Russia and Mongolia and of a Chinese population from the QTP. Our results confirmed the existence of a migratory divide between maurus and stejnegeri, albeit with extensive hybridization over generations. Of the 3 genotyped individuals employing intermediate routes across the QTP, 2 were clear hybrids. Meanwhile, przewalskii consistently followed a highland-crossing route and was genetically differentiated from maurus and stejnegeri. The diverse migration routes indicate that Asian stonechats respond differently to the geographical barrier. The partly viable intermediate route may be associated with hybridization and potentially facilitating gene flow between maurus and stejnegeri. The Asian stonechat complex thus offers great opportunities for research, with its specific evolutionary background associated with inhabiting and crossing the QTP, offering novel perspectives on the genetics and evolution of migration.
AB - Facing geographical barriers, phenotypic responses of migratory landbirds may differ even between closely related taxa: some may bypass barriers while others cross them. Such phenotypic variation can arise from different genetic backgrounds and lead to different adaptive processes. A classic example is migratory divide, i.e., breeding ranges where different migration-route phenotypes co-exist or meet. Such variation can facilitate an understanding of the evolutionary background of migration and responses to barriers. In Asia, a migratory divide has been suggested in response to the major landscape, the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) for 2 stonechat taxa (Siberian stonechat Saxicola maurus maurus and Amur stonechat S. stejnegeri). Detouring along either side of the QTP, these taxa are believed to disfavor crossing over the highland. However, the Tibetan stonechat (S. m. przewalskii), breeding on the QTP, may differ in its barrier response due to possible adaptation to high elevation. To investigate migration patterns and potentially associated genetic differences, we studied migration routes and population genetics of populations around the assumed migratory divide in Russia and Mongolia and of a Chinese population from the QTP. Our results confirmed the existence of a migratory divide between maurus and stejnegeri, albeit with extensive hybridization over generations. Of the 3 genotyped individuals employing intermediate routes across the QTP, 2 were clear hybrids. Meanwhile, przewalskii consistently followed a highland-crossing route and was genetically differentiated from maurus and stejnegeri. The diverse migration routes indicate that Asian stonechats respond differently to the geographical barrier. The partly viable intermediate route may be associated with hybridization and potentially facilitating gene flow between maurus and stejnegeri. The Asian stonechat complex thus offers great opportunities for research, with its specific evolutionary background associated with inhabiting and crossing the QTP, offering novel perspectives on the genetics and evolution of migration.
UR - https://doi.org/10.5441/001/1.705
U2 - 10.1093/evlett/qrag019
DO - 10.1093/evlett/qrag019
M3 - Article
SN - 2056-3744
VL - 10
SP - 396
EP - 412
JO - Evolution Letters
JF - Evolution Letters
IS - 4
M1 - qrag019
ER -