Methodology going astray in population biology

R. Hengeveld

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper analyses the broad methodological structure of population-biological theorising. In it, I show that the distinction between initial exploratory, hypothesis-generating research and the subsequent process-reconstructing, hypothesis-testing type of research is not being made. Rather, the hypotheses generated in population biology are elaborated in such detail that students confound the initial research phase with the subsequent hypotheses-testing phase of research. In this context, I therefore analyse some testing procedures within the exploration phase and show that, as an extreme form of confusion, statistical null-models are mistakenly given the status of causal population-biological theory.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)77-93
    JournalActa Biotheoretica
    Volume50
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Methodology going astray in population biology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this