Measuring tensions and intentions : mixing methods in the impact evaluation of development support to farmer organisations

G. Ton

Research output: Thesisinternal PhD, WU

Abstract

Development support must be able to prove its effectiveness. Impact evaluation is a way to generate this information. The thesis is about the design of these  impact evaluations and how research methods can be combined to obtain credible evidence on effectiveness. It contrasts two approaches to impact evaluation design, ‘randomistas’ (Does it work?) and ‘realistas’ (For whom does it work, and under what conditions?), and distils seven principles for research design that create synergy between these two approaches.  The thesis  covers various development interventions. The main research concerns a Bolivian grant fund that supports investments in processing by farmer groups. To assess the effectiveness of this fund it was necessary to develop and test a new tool to measure organisational strength of these groups, called Tension Containment Capacity and apply a new method of data analysis, Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Interestingly, grants to the older, larger and stronger organisations proved particularly unsuccessful.

Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
  • Wageningen University
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Bulte, Erwin, Promotor
Award date1 Dec 2015
Place of PublicationWageningen
Publisher
Print ISBNs9789462575738
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015

Keywords

  • farmers' associations
  • cooperatives
  • development economics
  • development aid
  • funding
  • agricultural products
  • development projects
  • program evaluation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring tensions and intentions : mixing methods in the impact evaluation of development support to farmer organisations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this