Mangrove conservation or shrimp farmer’s livelihood? The devolution of forest management and benefit sharing in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam

Ha Tran Thi Thu Ha, H. van Dijk, S.R. Bush

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Large parts of the world's remaining mangrove forest are lost due to the expansion of shrimp farming in coastal areas. Current forest allocation and subcontracting policies of the Vietnamese government with respect to the devolution of forest management and participation of local people in sustainable forest management reflect both environmental and economic concerns. The paper aims at investigating how the devolution of rights over forestland and benefit sharing mechanisms are related to actual rights and the distribution of benefits of forest management practices. The findings show that farmer's decision-making over mangroves is very much influenced by shrimp farming since the income from mangroves is very low compared to that from shrimp. Farmer's decision making over forest is very much influenced by the way in which the benefit sharing policy is implemented by the state-owned forestry companies and management boards. However, their attitudes towards mangrove plantation and protection are far from negative. The study supports the claim that shrimp farmers may well be able to plant, protect and manage mangroves if they have more rights and responsibilities over forests and are able to benefit more from the production of mangroves. In this way more sustainable management of mangrove forests may be promoted.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-193
JournalOcean & Coastal Management
Volume69
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • resource degradation
  • aquaculture
  • communities
  • district
  • africa
  • land

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Mangrove conservation or shrimp farmer’s livelihood? The devolution of forest management and benefit sharing in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this