Long-term sustainability of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta in question

An economic assessment of water management alternatives

Dung Duc Tran*, Gerardo van Halsema, Petra J.G.J. Hellegers, Long Phi Hoang, F. Ludwig

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

A dense dike system has been built in the upstream floodplains of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta, allowing large scale rice production based on compartmentalized fields and optimized water management. Intensive cultivation has enabled farmers to greatly increase their rice productivity and augment the national food bowl. However, flood-control structures have undermined the water retention capacity, compromising various benefits of floodwaters for delta ecosystems. Effects are both internal and external to farming. Negative internal effects are the large investment requirements and higher farming costs. Negative externalities include increased flood damage, reduced sediment flows, saltwater intrusion and riverbank erosion. In this study, we assessed the effects of three dike–agricultural system scenarios on delta-level sustainability, considering both internal and external effects. Direct and indirect costs were estimated using various methodologies and the literature. Our findings show that extensive development of high dikes on the floodplains is the least economical and most ecologically risky alternative. In this scenario, accelerated high-dike construction exacted a cost 136% greater than the situation represented by the baseline year of 2011. Externalities in this scenario contributed to rising economic losses in both aquaculture and agriculture. The scenario of transforming high-dike into low-dike systems revealed lower water management costs combined with lesser environmental impacts and greater capacity to exploit floodwater benefits. Our findings provide a useful input for decision-makers considering the unintended economic consequences of existing water management strategies. They support a transition to low-dike farming systems for a more sustainable delta.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105703
JournalAgricultural Water Management
Volume223
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

water management
dike
farming systems
sustainability
economics
floodplains
bank erosion
saltwater intrusion
rice
cost
water holding capacity
floodplain
aquaculture
environmental impact
foods
farmers
agriculture
sediments
saline intrusion
flood damage

Keywords

  • flood risk
  • Mekong
  • rice production
  • salinity intrusion
  • sediment
  • sustainability

Cite this

@article{e348f15437414a9e850e85a80d6f9b88,
title = "Long-term sustainability of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta in question: An economic assessment of water management alternatives",
abstract = "A dense dike system has been built in the upstream floodplains of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta, allowing large scale rice production based on compartmentalized fields and optimized water management. Intensive cultivation has enabled farmers to greatly increase their rice productivity and augment the national food bowl. However, flood-control structures have undermined the water retention capacity, compromising various benefits of floodwaters for delta ecosystems. Effects are both internal and external to farming. Negative internal effects are the large investment requirements and higher farming costs. Negative externalities include increased flood damage, reduced sediment flows, saltwater intrusion and riverbank erosion. In this study, we assessed the effects of three dike–agricultural system scenarios on delta-level sustainability, considering both internal and external effects. Direct and indirect costs were estimated using various methodologies and the literature. Our findings show that extensive development of high dikes on the floodplains is the least economical and most ecologically risky alternative. In this scenario, accelerated high-dike construction exacted a cost 136{\%} greater than the situation represented by the baseline year of 2011. Externalities in this scenario contributed to rising economic losses in both aquaculture and agriculture. The scenario of transforming high-dike into low-dike systems revealed lower water management costs combined with lesser environmental impacts and greater capacity to exploit floodwater benefits. Our findings provide a useful input for decision-makers considering the unintended economic consequences of existing water management strategies. They support a transition to low-dike farming systems for a more sustainable delta.",
keywords = "flood risk, Mekong, rice production, salinity intrusion, sediment, sustainability",
author = "Tran, {Dung Duc} and {van Halsema}, Gerardo and Hellegers, {Petra J.G.J.} and Hoang, {Long Phi} and F. Ludwig",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105703",
language = "English",
volume = "223",
journal = "Agricultural Water Management",
issn = "0378-3774",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term sustainability of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta in question

T2 - An economic assessment of water management alternatives

AU - Tran, Dung Duc

AU - van Halsema, Gerardo

AU - Hellegers, Petra J.G.J.

AU - Hoang, Long Phi

AU - Ludwig, F.

PY - 2019/8/20

Y1 - 2019/8/20

N2 - A dense dike system has been built in the upstream floodplains of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta, allowing large scale rice production based on compartmentalized fields and optimized water management. Intensive cultivation has enabled farmers to greatly increase their rice productivity and augment the national food bowl. However, flood-control structures have undermined the water retention capacity, compromising various benefits of floodwaters for delta ecosystems. Effects are both internal and external to farming. Negative internal effects are the large investment requirements and higher farming costs. Negative externalities include increased flood damage, reduced sediment flows, saltwater intrusion and riverbank erosion. In this study, we assessed the effects of three dike–agricultural system scenarios on delta-level sustainability, considering both internal and external effects. Direct and indirect costs were estimated using various methodologies and the literature. Our findings show that extensive development of high dikes on the floodplains is the least economical and most ecologically risky alternative. In this scenario, accelerated high-dike construction exacted a cost 136% greater than the situation represented by the baseline year of 2011. Externalities in this scenario contributed to rising economic losses in both aquaculture and agriculture. The scenario of transforming high-dike into low-dike systems revealed lower water management costs combined with lesser environmental impacts and greater capacity to exploit floodwater benefits. Our findings provide a useful input for decision-makers considering the unintended economic consequences of existing water management strategies. They support a transition to low-dike farming systems for a more sustainable delta.

AB - A dense dike system has been built in the upstream floodplains of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta, allowing large scale rice production based on compartmentalized fields and optimized water management. Intensive cultivation has enabled farmers to greatly increase their rice productivity and augment the national food bowl. However, flood-control structures have undermined the water retention capacity, compromising various benefits of floodwaters for delta ecosystems. Effects are both internal and external to farming. Negative internal effects are the large investment requirements and higher farming costs. Negative externalities include increased flood damage, reduced sediment flows, saltwater intrusion and riverbank erosion. In this study, we assessed the effects of three dike–agricultural system scenarios on delta-level sustainability, considering both internal and external effects. Direct and indirect costs were estimated using various methodologies and the literature. Our findings show that extensive development of high dikes on the floodplains is the least economical and most ecologically risky alternative. In this scenario, accelerated high-dike construction exacted a cost 136% greater than the situation represented by the baseline year of 2011. Externalities in this scenario contributed to rising economic losses in both aquaculture and agriculture. The scenario of transforming high-dike into low-dike systems revealed lower water management costs combined with lesser environmental impacts and greater capacity to exploit floodwater benefits. Our findings provide a useful input for decision-makers considering the unintended economic consequences of existing water management strategies. They support a transition to low-dike farming systems for a more sustainable delta.

KW - flood risk

KW - Mekong

KW - rice production

KW - salinity intrusion

KW - sediment

KW - sustainability

U2 - 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105703

DO - 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105703

M3 - Article

VL - 223

JO - Agricultural Water Management

JF - Agricultural Water Management

SN - 0378-3774

M1 - 105703

ER -