Abstract
Local community participation in complex technological projects, where technological
innovations and risks need to be managed, is notoriously challenging. Relations with
local inhabitants easily take the form of exclusion, protest, controversy or litigation.
While such projects represent opportunities for creating knowledge, business or
societal benefits from the perspective of the community of driving actors, they often
represent a potential threat to health, safety or prosperity from the perspective of the
community of people who happen to live near the facilities. What are the challenges
in dealing with this difference and which practices are helpful in bridging this gap? In
this paper we analyse the functioning of an organised group of local inhabitants in
the development of an Enhanced Landfill Mining project, where previously landfilled
waste is going to be used for recycling and energy production. We find that setting up
a multi-actor platform, organising a group of involved locals, combining formal and
informal communication channels, maintaining a mutually credible dialogue and
involving knowledgeable local people as bridging figures are important ingredients to
bridge the gap in this case. We also discuss the emerging challenges of local
community participation for all actors involved and especially for the organised group
of locals who risk to become a victim of its own success by being incorporated too
much in the project consortium and leaving a new gap to be bridged with the rest of
the local community.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 1-26 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
| Event | 2nd International Academic Symposium on Enhanced Landfill Mining, Houthalen-Helchteren - Duration: 14 Oct 2013 → 16 Oct 2013 |
Conference/symposium
| Conference/symposium | 2nd International Academic Symposium on Enhanced Landfill Mining, Houthalen-Helchteren |
|---|---|
| Period | 14/10/13 → 16/10/13 |