Legal Limits on Food Labelling Law: Comparative Analysis of the EU and the USA

E.L. van der Zee

Research output: Working paperAcademic

Abstract

The objective of this study is to explore to what extent freedom of expression should protect food businesses against government intervention with corporate communications on food labels. A functional comparative method was used to analyse the objective. It was found that expression on food labels should be considered primarily commercial in nature. In the USA some food labelling regulations are considered inconsistent with the freedom of commercial expression. EU courts seem to uphold government restrictions to commercial expression in all cases, especially when restrictions are based on protection of human health. It can be concluded that food businesses should only be able to claim free speech rights on food labels when it is of importance to the public or consumers.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherWageningen University Law and Governance group
Number of pages57
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2015

Publication series

NameWageningen working paper Law and Governance
No.2015/01

Fingerprint

EU
food
Law
corporate communication
regulation
health

Keywords

  • Freedom of expression, free speech, food labelling, corporate, constitutional rights

Cite this

van der Zee, E. L. (2015). Legal Limits on Food Labelling Law: Comparative Analysis of the EU and the USA. (Wageningen working paper Law and Governance; No. 2015/01). Wageningen University Law and Governance group.
van der Zee, E.L. / Legal Limits on Food Labelling Law: Comparative Analysis of the EU and the USA. Wageningen University Law and Governance group, 2015. (Wageningen working paper Law and Governance; 2015/01).
@techreport{08b9d6360ef5444ea52bf879fe2828fe,
title = "Legal Limits on Food Labelling Law: Comparative Analysis of the EU and the USA",
abstract = "The objective of this study is to explore to what extent freedom of expression should protect food businesses against government intervention with corporate communications on food labels. A functional comparative method was used to analyse the objective. It was found that expression on food labels should be considered primarily commercial in nature. In the USA some food labelling regulations are considered inconsistent with the freedom of commercial expression. EU courts seem to uphold government restrictions to commercial expression in all cases, especially when restrictions are based on protection of human health. It can be concluded that food businesses should only be able to claim free speech rights on food labels when it is of importance to the public or consumers.",
keywords = "Freedom of expression, free speech, food labelling, corporate, constitutional rights",
author = "{van der Zee}, E.L.",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "2",
language = "English",
series = "Wageningen working paper Law and Governance",
publisher = "Wageningen University Law and Governance group",
number = "2015/01",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Wageningen University Law and Governance group",

}

van der Zee, EL 2015 'Legal Limits on Food Labelling Law: Comparative Analysis of the EU and the USA' Wageningen working paper Law and Governance, no. 2015/01, Wageningen University Law and Governance group.

Legal Limits on Food Labelling Law: Comparative Analysis of the EU and the USA. / van der Zee, E.L.

Wageningen University Law and Governance group, 2015. (Wageningen working paper Law and Governance; No. 2015/01).

Research output: Working paperAcademic

TY - UNPB

T1 - Legal Limits on Food Labelling Law: Comparative Analysis of the EU and the USA

AU - van der Zee, E.L.

PY - 2015/4/2

Y1 - 2015/4/2

N2 - The objective of this study is to explore to what extent freedom of expression should protect food businesses against government intervention with corporate communications on food labels. A functional comparative method was used to analyse the objective. It was found that expression on food labels should be considered primarily commercial in nature. In the USA some food labelling regulations are considered inconsistent with the freedom of commercial expression. EU courts seem to uphold government restrictions to commercial expression in all cases, especially when restrictions are based on protection of human health. It can be concluded that food businesses should only be able to claim free speech rights on food labels when it is of importance to the public or consumers.

AB - The objective of this study is to explore to what extent freedom of expression should protect food businesses against government intervention with corporate communications on food labels. A functional comparative method was used to analyse the objective. It was found that expression on food labels should be considered primarily commercial in nature. In the USA some food labelling regulations are considered inconsistent with the freedom of commercial expression. EU courts seem to uphold government restrictions to commercial expression in all cases, especially when restrictions are based on protection of human health. It can be concluded that food businesses should only be able to claim free speech rights on food labels when it is of importance to the public or consumers.

KW - Freedom of expression, free speech, food labelling, corporate, constitutional rights

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Wageningen working paper Law and Governance

BT - Legal Limits on Food Labelling Law: Comparative Analysis of the EU and the USA

PB - Wageningen University Law and Governance group

ER -

van der Zee EL. Legal Limits on Food Labelling Law: Comparative Analysis of the EU and the USA. Wageningen University Law and Governance group. 2015 Apr 2. (Wageningen working paper Law and Governance; 2015/01).