Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG triggers intestinal epithelium injury in zebrafish revealing host dependent beneficial effects

Zhen Zhang, Hong Ling Zhang, Da Hai Yang, Qiang Hao, Hong Wei Yang, De Long Meng, Willem de Vos, Le Luo Guan, Shu Bin Liu, Tsegay Teame, Chen Chen Gao, Chao Ran, Ya Lin Yang, Yuan Yuan Yao, Qian Wen Ding*, Zhi Gang Zhou*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG), the well-characterized human-derived probiotic strain, possesses excellent properties in the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis, immunoregulation and defense against gastrointestinal pathogens in mammals. Here, we demonstrate that the SpaC pilin of LGG causes intestinal epithelium injury by inducing cell pyroptosis and gut microbial dysbiosis in zebrafish. Dietary SpaC activates Caspase-3−GSDMEa pathways in the intestinal epithelium, promotes intestinal pyroptosis and increases lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-producing gut microbes in zebrafish. The increased LPS subsequently activates Gaspy2−GSDMEb pyroptosis pathway. Further analysis reveals the Caspase-3−GSDMEa pyroptosis is initiated by the species-specific recognition of SpaC by TLR4ba, which accounts for the species-specificity of the SpaC-inducing intestinal pyroptosis in zebrafish. The observed pyroptosis-driven gut injury and microbial dysbiosis by LGG in zebrafish suggest that host-specific beneficial/harmful mechanisms are critical safety issues when applying probiotics derived from other host species and need more attention.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere181
JournaliMeta
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024

Keywords

  • intestinal mucosal damage
  • Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG
  • probiotic safety
  • SpaC
  • zebrafish

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG triggers intestinal epithelium injury in zebrafish revealing host dependent beneficial effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this