Key principles and operational practices for improved nanotechnology environmental exposure assessment

Claus Svendsen, Lee A. Walker, Marianne Matzke, Elma Lahive, Samuel Harrison, Alison Crossley, Barry Park, Stephen Lofts, Iseult Lynch, Socorro Vázquez-Campos, Ralf Kaegi, Alexander Gogos, Christof Asbach, Geert Cornelis, Frank von der Kammer, Nico W. van den Brink, Claire Mays, David J. Spurgeon*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Nanotechnology is identified as a key enabling technology due to its potential to contribute to economic growth and societal well-being across industrial sectors. Sustainable nanotechnology requires a scientifically based and proportionate risk governance structure to support innovation, including a robust framework for environmental risk assessment (ERA) that ideally builds on methods established for conventional chemicals to ensure alignment and avoid duplication. Exposure assessment developed as a tiered approach is equally beneficial to nano-specific ERA as for other classes of chemicals. Here we present the developing knowledge, practical considerations and key principles need to support exposure assessment for engineered nanomaterials for regulatory and research applications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)731-742
JournalNature Nanotechnology
Volume15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Key principles and operational practices for improved nanotechnology environmental exposure assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this