TY - JOUR
T1 - Keeping modelling notebooks with TRACE
T2 - Good for you and good for environmental research and management support
AU - Ayllón, Daniel
AU - Railsback, Steven F.
AU - Gallagher, Cara
AU - Augusiak, Jacqueline
AU - Baveco, Hans
AU - Berger, Uta
AU - Charles, Sandrine
AU - Martin, Romina
AU - Focks, Andreas
AU - Galic, Nika
AU - Liu, Chun
AU - van Loon, E.E.
AU - Nabe-Nielsen, Jacob
AU - Piou, Cyril
AU - Polhill, J.G.
AU - Preuss, Thomas G.
AU - Radchuk, Viktoriia
AU - Schmolke, Amelie
AU - Stadnicka-Michalak, Julita
AU - Thorbek, Pernille
AU - Grimm, Volker
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - The acceptance and usefulness of simulation models are often limited by the efficiency, transparency, reproducibility, and reliability of the modelling process. We address these issues by suggesting that modellers (1) “trace” the iterative modelling process by keeping a modelling notebook corresponding to the laboratory notebooks used by empirical researchers, (2) use a standardized notebook structure and terminology based on the existing TRACE documentation framework, and (3) use their notebooks to compile TRACE documents that supplement publications and reports. These practices have benefits for model developers, users, and stakeholders: improved and efficient model design, analysis, testing, and application; increased model acceptance and reuse; and replicability and reproducibility of the model and the simulation experiments. Using TRACE terminology and structure in modelling notebooks facilitates production of TRACE documents. We explain the rationale of TRACE, provide example TRACE documents, and suggest strategies for keeping “TRACE Modelling Notebooks.”
AB - The acceptance and usefulness of simulation models are often limited by the efficiency, transparency, reproducibility, and reliability of the modelling process. We address these issues by suggesting that modellers (1) “trace” the iterative modelling process by keeping a modelling notebook corresponding to the laboratory notebooks used by empirical researchers, (2) use a standardized notebook structure and terminology based on the existing TRACE documentation framework, and (3) use their notebooks to compile TRACE documents that supplement publications and reports. These practices have benefits for model developers, users, and stakeholders: improved and efficient model design, analysis, testing, and application; increased model acceptance and reuse; and replicability and reproducibility of the model and the simulation experiments. Using TRACE terminology and structure in modelling notebooks facilitates production of TRACE documents. We explain the rationale of TRACE, provide example TRACE documents, and suggest strategies for keeping “TRACE Modelling Notebooks.”
KW - Environmental modelling
KW - Model documentation
KW - Modelling cycle
KW - Reproducible research
KW - Scientific communication
KW - Standards
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104932
DO - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104932
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85097451639
SN - 1364-8152
VL - 136
JO - Environmental Modelling and Software
JF - Environmental Modelling and Software
M1 - 104932
ER -