Introducing the key patch approach for habitat networks with persistent populations: an example for marshland birds

J. Verboom, R.P.B. Foppen, J.P. Chardon, P.F.M. Opdam, P. Luttikhuizen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

146 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In landscapes where natural habitat is highly fragmented, any method for assessment of population persistence or potential for biodiversity should be based upon metapopulation theory, taking into account the spatial and temporal dynamics of species. We argue that methods based upon species distribution data, population viability analyses (PVA), or landscape indices alone all have severe flaws. We introduce an approach based upon a combination of the three methods, in which ecologically scaled landscape indices (ESLI) are compared to spatial standards derived from both analysis of distribution data and PVA-type simulations. We derive spatial standards, introducing the key patch approach. Key patches are large patches with a stabilizing role in habitat networks. Key patch standards were developed using spatial analysis of presence–absence data and calibrated metapopulation models for marshland bird species. We show examples of the application of this approach in land use management at both regional and national planning scales.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-101
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume100
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

metapopulation
bird
birds
viability
habitat
national planning
habitats
land use planning
regional planning
spatial analysis
data analysis
persistence
biogeography
methodology
biodiversity
land use
simulation
method
index
distribution

Cite this

@article{f9feb9c29595495d86f44b63a2b86d74,
title = "Introducing the key patch approach for habitat networks with persistent populations: an example for marshland birds",
abstract = "In landscapes where natural habitat is highly fragmented, any method for assessment of population persistence or potential for biodiversity should be based upon metapopulation theory, taking into account the spatial and temporal dynamics of species. We argue that methods based upon species distribution data, population viability analyses (PVA), or landscape indices alone all have severe flaws. We introduce an approach based upon a combination of the three methods, in which ecologically scaled landscape indices (ESLI) are compared to spatial standards derived from both analysis of distribution data and PVA-type simulations. We derive spatial standards, introducing the key patch approach. Key patches are large patches with a stabilizing role in habitat networks. Key patch standards were developed using spatial analysis of presence–absence data and calibrated metapopulation models for marshland bird species. We show examples of the application of this approach in land use management at both regional and national planning scales.",
author = "J. Verboom and R.P.B. Foppen and J.P. Chardon and P.F.M. Opdam and P. Luttikhuizen",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00210-X",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "98--101",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Introducing the key patch approach for habitat networks with persistent populations: an example for marshland birds. / Verboom, J.; Foppen, R.P.B.; Chardon, J.P.; Opdam, P.F.M.; Luttikhuizen, P.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 100, 2001, p. 98-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introducing the key patch approach for habitat networks with persistent populations: an example for marshland birds

AU - Verboom, J.

AU - Foppen, R.P.B.

AU - Chardon, J.P.

AU - Opdam, P.F.M.

AU - Luttikhuizen, P.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - In landscapes where natural habitat is highly fragmented, any method for assessment of population persistence or potential for biodiversity should be based upon metapopulation theory, taking into account the spatial and temporal dynamics of species. We argue that methods based upon species distribution data, population viability analyses (PVA), or landscape indices alone all have severe flaws. We introduce an approach based upon a combination of the three methods, in which ecologically scaled landscape indices (ESLI) are compared to spatial standards derived from both analysis of distribution data and PVA-type simulations. We derive spatial standards, introducing the key patch approach. Key patches are large patches with a stabilizing role in habitat networks. Key patch standards were developed using spatial analysis of presence–absence data and calibrated metapopulation models for marshland bird species. We show examples of the application of this approach in land use management at both regional and national planning scales.

AB - In landscapes where natural habitat is highly fragmented, any method for assessment of population persistence or potential for biodiversity should be based upon metapopulation theory, taking into account the spatial and temporal dynamics of species. We argue that methods based upon species distribution data, population viability analyses (PVA), or landscape indices alone all have severe flaws. We introduce an approach based upon a combination of the three methods, in which ecologically scaled landscape indices (ESLI) are compared to spatial standards derived from both analysis of distribution data and PVA-type simulations. We derive spatial standards, introducing the key patch approach. Key patches are large patches with a stabilizing role in habitat networks. Key patch standards were developed using spatial analysis of presence–absence data and calibrated metapopulation models for marshland bird species. We show examples of the application of this approach in land use management at both regional and national planning scales.

U2 - 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00210-X

DO - 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00210-X

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 98

EP - 101

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

ER -