International organizations, advocacy coalitions, and domestication of global norms

Debates on climate change in Canada, the US, Brazil, and India

Anna Kukkonen*, Tuomas Ylä-Anttila, Pradip Swarnakar, Jeffrey Broadbent, Myanna Lahsen, Mark C.J. Stoddart

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

National climate policies are shaped by international organizations (IOs) and global norms. Drawing from World Society Theory and the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), we develop two related arguments: (1) one way in which IOs can influence national climate policy is through their engagement in mass-mediated national policy debates and (2) national organizations involved in the policy process may form advocacy coalitions to support or oppose the norms promoted by IOs. To examine the role of IOs in national policy debates and the coalitions that support and oppose them, we use discourse network analysis (DNA) on over 3500 statements in 11 newspapers in Canada, the United States (US), Brazil, and India. We find that in the high-income countries that are high per capita emitters (Canada and the US), IOs are less central in the policy debates and the discourse network is strongly clustered into competing advocacy coalitions. In the lower-income countries that are low per capita emitters (Brazil and India), IOs are more central and the discourse network is less clustered. Relating these findings to earlier research, we suggest that the differences we find between high and low per capita emitters may be to some extent generalizable to the relevant country groups beyond our four cases.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-62
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume81
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

domestication
advocacy
international organization
International Organizations
coalition
climate change
Brazil
Canada
India
climate policy
environmental policy
discourse
income
world society
network analysis
norm
newspaper
low income
policy
Group

Keywords

  • Advocacy coalition framework
  • Climate policy
  • Discourse network analysis
  • Domestication
  • Global norms
  • International organizations

Cite this

Kukkonen, Anna ; Ylä-Anttila, Tuomas ; Swarnakar, Pradip ; Broadbent, Jeffrey ; Lahsen, Myanna ; Stoddart, Mark C.J. / International organizations, advocacy coalitions, and domestication of global norms : Debates on climate change in Canada, the US, Brazil, and India. In: Environmental Science and Policy. 2018 ; Vol. 81. pp. 54-62.
@article{451825baed334fb080fd491b28fb5738,
title = "International organizations, advocacy coalitions, and domestication of global norms: Debates on climate change in Canada, the US, Brazil, and India",
abstract = "National climate policies are shaped by international organizations (IOs) and global norms. Drawing from World Society Theory and the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), we develop two related arguments: (1) one way in which IOs can influence national climate policy is through their engagement in mass-mediated national policy debates and (2) national organizations involved in the policy process may form advocacy coalitions to support or oppose the norms promoted by IOs. To examine the role of IOs in national policy debates and the coalitions that support and oppose them, we use discourse network analysis (DNA) on over 3500 statements in 11 newspapers in Canada, the United States (US), Brazil, and India. We find that in the high-income countries that are high per capita emitters (Canada and the US), IOs are less central in the policy debates and the discourse network is strongly clustered into competing advocacy coalitions. In the lower-income countries that are low per capita emitters (Brazil and India), IOs are more central and the discourse network is less clustered. Relating these findings to earlier research, we suggest that the differences we find between high and low per capita emitters may be to some extent generalizable to the relevant country groups beyond our four cases.",
keywords = "Advocacy coalition framework, Climate policy, Discourse network analysis, Domestication, Global norms, International organizations",
author = "Anna Kukkonen and Tuomas Yl{\"a}-Anttila and Pradip Swarnakar and Jeffrey Broadbent and Myanna Lahsen and Stoddart, {Mark C.J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2017.12.008",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "54--62",
journal = "Environmental Science & Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

International organizations, advocacy coalitions, and domestication of global norms : Debates on climate change in Canada, the US, Brazil, and India. / Kukkonen, Anna; Ylä-Anttila, Tuomas; Swarnakar, Pradip; Broadbent, Jeffrey; Lahsen, Myanna; Stoddart, Mark C.J.

In: Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 81, 01.03.2018, p. 54-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - International organizations, advocacy coalitions, and domestication of global norms

T2 - Debates on climate change in Canada, the US, Brazil, and India

AU - Kukkonen, Anna

AU - Ylä-Anttila, Tuomas

AU - Swarnakar, Pradip

AU - Broadbent, Jeffrey

AU - Lahsen, Myanna

AU - Stoddart, Mark C.J.

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - National climate policies are shaped by international organizations (IOs) and global norms. Drawing from World Society Theory and the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), we develop two related arguments: (1) one way in which IOs can influence national climate policy is through their engagement in mass-mediated national policy debates and (2) national organizations involved in the policy process may form advocacy coalitions to support or oppose the norms promoted by IOs. To examine the role of IOs in national policy debates and the coalitions that support and oppose them, we use discourse network analysis (DNA) on over 3500 statements in 11 newspapers in Canada, the United States (US), Brazil, and India. We find that in the high-income countries that are high per capita emitters (Canada and the US), IOs are less central in the policy debates and the discourse network is strongly clustered into competing advocacy coalitions. In the lower-income countries that are low per capita emitters (Brazil and India), IOs are more central and the discourse network is less clustered. Relating these findings to earlier research, we suggest that the differences we find between high and low per capita emitters may be to some extent generalizable to the relevant country groups beyond our four cases.

AB - National climate policies are shaped by international organizations (IOs) and global norms. Drawing from World Society Theory and the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), we develop two related arguments: (1) one way in which IOs can influence national climate policy is through their engagement in mass-mediated national policy debates and (2) national organizations involved in the policy process may form advocacy coalitions to support or oppose the norms promoted by IOs. To examine the role of IOs in national policy debates and the coalitions that support and oppose them, we use discourse network analysis (DNA) on over 3500 statements in 11 newspapers in Canada, the United States (US), Brazil, and India. We find that in the high-income countries that are high per capita emitters (Canada and the US), IOs are less central in the policy debates and the discourse network is strongly clustered into competing advocacy coalitions. In the lower-income countries that are low per capita emitters (Brazil and India), IOs are more central and the discourse network is less clustered. Relating these findings to earlier research, we suggest that the differences we find between high and low per capita emitters may be to some extent generalizable to the relevant country groups beyond our four cases.

KW - Advocacy coalition framework

KW - Climate policy

KW - Discourse network analysis

KW - Domestication

KW - Global norms

KW - International organizations

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.12.008

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.12.008

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 54

EP - 62

JO - Environmental Science & Policy

JF - Environmental Science & Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -